TSTP Solution File: SET978+1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : SET978+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 22:53:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 1.05s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET978+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 16:04:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/1.05  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.44/1.05  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.44/1.05  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.44/1.05  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  Clauses:
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  { empty( skol1 ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  { ! empty( skol2 ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  { ! disjoint( X, Y ), disjoint( Y, X ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  { ! disjoint( X, Y ), disjoint( cartesian_product2( X, Z ), 
% 0.44/1.05    cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  { ! disjoint( Z, T ), disjoint( cartesian_product2( X, Z ), 
% 0.44/1.05    cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  { ! skol3 = skol4 }.
% 0.44/1.05  { ! disjoint( cartesian_product2( singleton( skol3 ), skol5 ), 
% 0.44/1.05    cartesian_product2( singleton( skol4 ), skol6 ) ), ! disjoint( 
% 0.44/1.05    cartesian_product2( skol5, singleton( skol3 ) ), cartesian_product2( 
% 0.44/1.05    skol6, singleton( skol4 ) ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  { X = Y, disjoint( singleton( X ), singleton( Y ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  percentage equality = 0.153846, percentage horn = 0.875000
% 0.44/1.05  This is a problem with some equality
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  Options Used:
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  useres =            1
% 0.44/1.05  useparamod =        1
% 0.44/1.05  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.44/1.05  useeqfact =         1
% 0.44/1.05  usefactor =         1
% 0.44/1.05  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.44/1.05  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.44/1.05  usesimpres =        3
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.44/1.05  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.44/1.05  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.44/1.05  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.44/1.05  selectoldest =      5
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.44/1.05  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  termordering =      kbo
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  litapriori =        0
% 0.44/1.05  termapriori =       1
% 0.44/1.05  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.44/1.05  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.44/1.05  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.44/1.05  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  litselect =         negord
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  maxweight =         15
% 0.44/1.05  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.44/1.05  maxlength =         115
% 0.44/1.05  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.44/1.05  excuselevel =       1
% 0.44/1.05  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.44/1.05  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  showgenerated =    0
% 0.44/1.05  showkept =         0
% 0.44/1.05  showselected =     0
% 0.44/1.05  showdeleted =      0
% 0.44/1.05  showresimp =       1
% 0.44/1.05  showstatus =       2000
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  prologoutput =     0
% 0.44/1.05  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.44/1.05  totalproof =       1
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:23, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  empty  [36, 1]      (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  disjoint  [38, 2]      (w:1, o:48, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  cartesian_product2  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:47, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  singleton  [42, 1]      (w:1, o:22, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.44/1.05  skol1  [43, 0]      (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.05  skol2  [44, 0]      (w:1, o:11, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.05  skol3  [45, 0]      (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.05  skol4  [46, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.05  skol5  [47, 0]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.44/1.05  skol6  [48, 0]      (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:1).
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  Starting Search:
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.44/1.05  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/1.05  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  (3) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2} I { ! disjoint( X, Y ), disjoint( 
% 0.44/1.05    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (4) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2} I { ! disjoint( Z, T ), disjoint( 
% 0.44/1.05    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (5) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! skol4 ==> skol3 }.
% 0.44/1.05  (6) {G0,W18,D4,L2,V0,M2} I { ! disjoint( cartesian_product2( singleton( 
% 0.44/1.05    skol3 ), skol5 ), cartesian_product2( singleton( skol4 ), skol6 ) ), ! 
% 0.44/1.05    disjoint( cartesian_product2( skol5, singleton( skol3 ) ), 
% 0.44/1.05    cartesian_product2( skol6, singleton( skol4 ) ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (7) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2} I { X = Y, disjoint( singleton( X ), singleton( Y )
% 0.44/1.05     ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (13) {G1,W8,D3,L2,V1,M2} P(7,5) { ! X = skol3, disjoint( singleton( X ), 
% 0.44/1.05    singleton( skol4 ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (18) {G2,W5,D3,L1,V0,M1} Q(13) { disjoint( singleton( skol3 ), singleton( 
% 0.44/1.05    skol4 ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (37) {G3,W9,D4,L1,V2,M1} R(18,3) { disjoint( cartesian_product2( singleton
% 0.44/1.05    ( skol3 ), X ), cartesian_product2( singleton( skol4 ), Y ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (63) {G3,W9,D4,L1,V2,M1} R(4,18) { disjoint( cartesian_product2( X, 
% 0.44/1.05    singleton( skol3 ) ), cartesian_product2( Y, singleton( skol4 ) ) ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (104) {G4,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(6);r(37);r(63) {  }.
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/1.05  found a proof!
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.44/1.05  
% 0.44/1.05  (106) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { empty( skol1 ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (107) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! empty( skol2 ) }.
% 0.44/1.05  (108) {G0,W6,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! disjoint( X, Y ), disjoint( Y, X ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  (109) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2}  { ! disjoint( X, Y ), disjoint( 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  (110) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2}  { ! disjoint( Z, T ), disjoint( 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  (111) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol3 = skol4 }.
% 19.45/19.84  (112) {G0,W18,D4,L2,V0,M2}  { ! disjoint( cartesian_product2( singleton( 
% 19.45/19.84    skol3 ), skol5 ), cartesian_product2( singleton( skol4 ), skol6 ) ), ! 
% 19.45/19.84    disjoint( cartesian_product2( skol5, singleton( skol3 ) ), 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( skol6, singleton( skol4 ) ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  (113) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2}  { X = Y, disjoint( singleton( X ), singleton( Y
% 19.45/19.84     ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  Total Proof:
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  subsumption: (3) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2} I { ! disjoint( X, Y ), disjoint( 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  parent0: (109) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2}  { ! disjoint( X, Y ), disjoint( 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  substitution0:
% 19.45/19.84     X := X
% 19.45/19.84     Y := Y
% 19.45/19.84     Z := Z
% 19.45/19.84     T := T
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  permutation0:
% 19.45/19.84     0 ==> 0
% 19.45/19.84     1 ==> 1
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  subsumption: (4) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2} I { ! disjoint( Z, T ), disjoint( 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  parent0: (110) {G0,W10,D3,L2,V4,M2}  { ! disjoint( Z, T ), disjoint( 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( X, Z ), cartesian_product2( Y, T ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  substitution0:
% 19.45/19.84     X := X
% 19.45/19.84     Y := Y
% 19.45/19.84     Z := Z
% 19.45/19.84     T := T
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  permutation0:
% 19.45/19.84     0 ==> 0
% 19.45/19.84     1 ==> 1
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  eqswap: (114) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol4 = skol3 }.
% 19.45/19.84  parent0[0]: (111) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol3 = skol4 }.
% 19.45/19.84  substitution0:
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  subsumption: (5) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! skol4 ==> skol3 }.
% 19.45/19.84  parent0: (114) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! skol4 = skol3 }.
% 19.45/19.84  substitution0:
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  permutation0:
% 19.45/19.84     0 ==> 0
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  subsumption: (6) {G0,W18,D4,L2,V0,M2} I { ! disjoint( cartesian_product2( 
% 19.45/19.84    singleton( skol3 ), skol5 ), cartesian_product2( singleton( skol4 ), 
% 19.45/19.84    skol6 ) ), ! disjoint( cartesian_product2( skol5, singleton( skol3 ) ), 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( skol6, singleton( skol4 ) ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  parent0: (112) {G0,W18,D4,L2,V0,M2}  { ! disjoint( cartesian_product2( 
% 19.45/19.84    singleton( skol3 ), skol5 ), cartesian_product2( singleton( skol4 ), 
% 19.45/19.84    skol6 ) ), ! disjoint( cartesian_product2( skol5, singleton( skol3 ) ), 
% 19.45/19.84    cartesian_product2( skol6, singleton( skol4 ) ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  substitution0:
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  permutation0:
% 19.45/19.84     0 ==> 0
% 19.45/19.84     1 ==> 1
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  subsumption: (7) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2} I { X = Y, disjoint( singleton( X ), 
% 19.45/19.84    singleton( Y ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  parent0: (113) {G0,W8,D3,L2,V2,M2}  { X = Y, disjoint( singleton( X ), 
% 19.45/19.84    singleton( Y ) ) }.
% 19.45/19.84  substitution0:
% 19.45/19.84     X := X
% 19.45/19.84     Y := Y
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  permutation0:
% 19.45/19.84     0 ==> 0
% 19.45/19.84     1 ==> 1
% 19.45/19.84  end
% 19.45/19.84  
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 15000 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 15000 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 15000 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 22500 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 22500 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 22500 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 33750 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 33750 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 33750 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 50625 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 50625 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 50625 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 75937 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 75937 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 75937 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 113905 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 113905 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 113905 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 170857 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 170857 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 170857 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 256285 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 256285 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 384427 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 256285 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 576640 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 384427 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 384427 integers for clauses
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 864960 integers for termspace/termends
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocated 576640 integers for justifications
% 19.45/19.84  *** allocatedCputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------