TSTP Solution File: SET975+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET975+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:22:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET975+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 12:58:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Sun Jul 10 12:58:50 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 10076.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 13 during input processing: 0 [copy,13,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.13/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.42  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.42  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.42  number of clauses in intial UL: 12
% 0.20/0.42  number of clauses initially in problem: 20
% 0.20/0.42  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 60
% 0.20/0.42  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.20/0.42  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.42  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.20/0.42     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.20/0.42     distinct function count: 5
% 0.20/0.42     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.10 sec ----> 819 [hyper,226,259,251] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  2 [] {+} A!=singleton(B)| -in(C,A)|C=B.
% 0.20/0.48  3 [] {+} A!=singleton(B)|in(C,A)|C!=B.
% 0.20/0.48  6 [] {+} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.20/0.48  7 [] {+} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.20/0.48  8 [] {+} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.20/0.48  10 [] {+} -in(ordered_pair($c6,$c5),cartesian_product2(singleton($c4),$c3))|$c6!=$c4| -in($c5,$c3).
% 0.20/0.48  19 [] {-} in(ordered_pair($c6,$c5),cartesian_product2(singleton($c4),$c3))|$c6=$c4.
% 0.20/0.48  20 [] {-} in(ordered_pair($c6,$c5),cartesian_product2(singleton($c4),$c3))|in($c5,$c3).
% 0.20/0.48  21 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.48  26 [hyper,21,3,21] {-} in(A,singleton(A)).
% 0.20/0.48  149 [hyper,19,6] {-} $c6=$c4|in($c6,singleton($c4)).
% 0.20/0.48  208,207 [hyper,149,2,21,factor_simp] {-} $c6=$c4.
% 0.20/0.48  226 [back_demod,10,demod,208,208,unit_del,21] {-} -in(ordered_pair($c4,$c5),cartesian_product2(singleton($c4),$c3))| -in($c5,$c3).
% 0.20/0.48  251 [hyper,20,7,factor_simp] {-} in($c5,$c3).
% 0.20/0.48  259 [hyper,251,8,26] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,$c5),cartesian_product2(singleton(A),$c3)).
% 0.20/0.48  819 [hyper,226,259,251] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.48  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Process 10076 finished Sun Jul 10 12:58:50 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------