TSTP Solution File: SET974+1 by Leo-III---1.7.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.12
% Problem : SET974+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:04:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.42s 2.03s
% Output : Refutation 3.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 15 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 10 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 192 ( 20 ~; 3 |; 12 &; 150 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 14 ( 14 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 65 ( 0 ^ 59 !; 6 ?; 65 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(disjoint_type,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(cartesian_product2_type,type,
cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(set_intersection2_type,type,
set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(ordered_pair_type,type,
ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_type,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(empty_type,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
| ( disjoint @ C @ D ) )
=> ( disjoint @ ( cartesian_product2 @ A @ C ) @ ( cartesian_product2 @ B @ D ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t127_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
| ( disjoint @ C @ D ) )
=> ( disjoint @ ( cartesian_product2 @ A @ C ) @ ( cartesian_product2 @ B @ D ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(14,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
| ( disjoint @ C @ D ) )
=> ( disjoint @ ( cartesian_product2 @ A @ C ) @ ( cartesian_product2 @ B @ D ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( ordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( ordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ ( set_intersection2 @ ( cartesian_product2 @ B @ C ) @ ( cartesian_product2 @ D @ E ) ) )
& ! [F: $i,G: $i] :
~ ( ( A
= ( ordered_pair @ F @ G ) )
& ( in @ F @ ( set_intersection2 @ B @ D ) )
& ( in @ G @ ( set_intersection2 @ C @ E ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t104_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(41,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ ( set_intersection2 @ ( cartesian_product2 @ B @ C ) @ ( cartesian_product2 @ D @ E ) ) )
& ! [F: $i,G: $i] :
~ ( ( A
= ( ordered_pair @ F @ G ) )
& ( in @ F @ ( set_intersection2 @ B @ D ) )
& ( in @ G @ ( set_intersection2 @ C @ E ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B )
= ( set_intersection2 @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B )
= ( set_intersection2 @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).
thf(31,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ~ ( disjoint @ A @ B )
& ! [C: $i] :
~ ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) ) )
& ~ ( ? [C: $i] : ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) )
& ( disjoint @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0) ).
thf(47,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ~ ( disjoint @ A @ B )
& ! [C: $i] :
~ ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) ) )
& ~ ( ? [C: $i] : ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) )
& ( disjoint @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(34,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(17,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(36,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(19,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(54,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,14,28,41,22,39,31,47,34,17,36,19]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10 % Problem : SET974+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.13 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon May 20 12:39:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.94/0.96 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.28/1.08 % [INFO] Parsing done (122ms).
% 1.28/1.09 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.59/1.36 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.59/1.36 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.59/1.37 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.88/1.43 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 11 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.93/1.46 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 11 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.93/1.48 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 1.93/1.49 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.93/1.49 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.42/2.02 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.42/2.02 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.42/2.02 % Time passed: 1486ms (effective reasoning time: 931ms)
% 3.42/2.03 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.42/2.03 % Axioms used in derivation (11): fc1_zfmisc_1, idempotence_k3_xboole_0, d5_tarski, commutativity_k3_xboole_0, t4_xboole_0, t104_zfmisc_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, rc1_xboole_0, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 3.42/2.03 % No. of inferences in proof: 26
% 3.42/2.03 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1486 ms resp. 931 ms w/o parsing
% 3.50/2.08 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.50/2.08 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------