TSTP Solution File: SET971+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SET971+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:36:29 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  14 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   7   ~;   2   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn;  24   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    set_intersection2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

fof(t124_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X3,X4) )
     => set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X4),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)) = cartesian_product2(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t124_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t123_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(X1,X2),set_intersection2(X3,X4)) = set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t123_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).

fof(t28_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_intersection2(X1,X2) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t28_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ( subset(X1,X2)
          & subset(X3,X4) )
       => set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X4),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)) = cartesian_product2(X1,X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t124_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & subset(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    & set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0)) != cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X11,X12,X13,X14] : cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(X11,X12),set_intersection2(X13,X14)) = set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X11,X13),cartesian_product2(X12,X14)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t123_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] : set_intersection2(X5,X6) = set_intersection2(X6,X5),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ~ subset(X19,X20)
      | set_intersection2(X19,X20) = X19 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t28_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0)) != cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(X1,X2),set_intersection2(X3,X4)) = set_intersection2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = X1
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0) = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2(set_intersection2(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk3_0,esk4_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET971+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 11:58:27 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.55  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.57  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.57  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.57  % Total time : 0.006000 s
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.57  % Total time : 0.009000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------