TSTP Solution File: SET962+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET962+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:13:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.42s 0.59s
% Output   : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   7 unt;   3 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (   7 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X,Y),cartesian_product2(Z,U))
    | in(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X,Y),cartesian_product2(Z,U))
    | in(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X,Y),cartesian_product2(Z,U))
    | ~ in(X,Z)
    | ~ in(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(9,negated_conjecture,
    cartesian_product2('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS3') = cartesian_product2('SKOLEMAAAS4','SKOLEMAAAS4'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(10,negated_conjecture,
    'SKOLEMAAAS3' != 'SKOLEMAAAS4',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ in('SKOLEMAAAS5'(X,Y),X)
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAS5'(X,Y),Y)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAS5'(X,Y),X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAS5'(X,Y),Y)
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X,Y),cartesian_product2('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS3'))
    | in(Y,'SKOLEMAAAS4') ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,9,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAS5'(X,Y),Y)
    | X = Y
    | in('SKOLEMAAAS5'(Z,U),U)
    | Z = U
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAS5'(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAS5'(Z,U)),cartesian_product2(X,Z)) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,12,12]) ).

cnf(107,plain,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAS5'('SKOLEMAAAS3',X),X)
    | 'SKOLEMAAAS3' = X
    | in('SKOLEMAAAS5'('SKOLEMAAAS3',X),'SKOLEMAAAS4') ),
    inference('CONDENSE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[16,17])]) ).

cnf(116,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAS5'('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS4'),'SKOLEMAAAS4'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[107,10]) ).

cnf(132,plain,
    ~ in('SKOLEMAAAS5'('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS4'),'SKOLEMAAAS3'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,116,10]) ).

cnf(134,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAS5'('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS4'),'SKOLEMAAAS5'('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS4')),cartesian_product2('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS3')),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,116,116]),9,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(145,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAS5'('SKOLEMAAAS3','SKOLEMAAAS4'),X),cartesian_product2('SKOLEMAAAS3',Y)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,132]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[134,145]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SET962+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 18:47:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  "."
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T18:47:11
% 0.20/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T18:47:11
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.42/0.59  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  #||
% 0.42/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.59  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.60  ||#
% 0.42/0.60  
% 0.42/0.60  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.42/0.60  ;       245 formulas have been input or derived (from 27 formulas).
% 0.42/0.60  ;       146 (60%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.42/0.60  ;            2 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.42/0.60  ;          144 (99%) are still being kept.
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.002   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (9 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.033  30%   Process new row              (226 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.007   6%   Resolution                   (52 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.005   5%   Paramodulation               (26 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.003   3%   Condensing                   (61 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.005   5%   Forward subsumption          (61 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.001   1%   Backward subsumption         (46 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.002   2%   Clause clause subsumption    (385 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.013  12%   Forward simplification       (226 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.008   7%   Backward simplification      (146 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.008   7%   Ordering                     (653 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.020  18%   Other
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.109        Total
% 0.42/0.60  ;     0.112        Real time
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; Term-hash-array has 531 terms in all.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 45 entries (46 at peak, 46 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 181 nodes (181 at peak, 181 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ;  Retrieved 394 possibly forward subsuming rows in 61 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ;  Retrieved 65 possibly backward subsumed rows in 46 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Path-index has 532 entries (535 at peak, 535 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Path-index has 2,947 nodes (2,947 at peak, 2,947 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Trie-index has 532 entries (535 at peak, 535 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Trie-index has 9,480 nodes (9,487 at peak, 9,487 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 65 generalization terms in 892 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 101 instance terms in 99 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; Retrieved 929 unifiable terms in 220 calls.
% 0.42/0.60  ; 
% 0.42/0.60  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value 0
% 0.42/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value 17
% 0.42/0.60  ; The agenda of rows to give has 117 entries:
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 11)          3 with value (4 58)           1 with value (4 80)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 17)          3 with value (4 59)           1 with value (4 81)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 26)          2 with value (4 60)           4 with value (4 90)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     7 with value (4 29)          2 with value (4 62)           1 with value (4 91)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 33)          1 with value (4 63)           1 with value (4 93)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     3 with value (4 37)          1 with value (4 65)           1 with value (4 95)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 38)          1 with value (4 67)           8 with value (4 96)
% 0.42/0.60  ;    11 with value (4 39)          1 with value (4 69)           2 with value (4 97)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     2 with value (4 43)          1 with value (4 70)           1 with value (4 98)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     3 with value (4 45)          2 with value (4 72)           5 with value (4 99)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     4 with value (4 47)          6 with value (4 73)           1 with value (4 100)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 48)          2 with value (4 75)           3 with value (4 101)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     1 with value (4 54)          5 with value (4 76)           3 with value (4 103)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     2 with value (4 55)          1 with value (4 77)           1 with value (4 104)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     5 with value (4 56)          2 with value (4 78)           1 with value (4 106)
% 0.42/0.60  ;     5 with value (4 57)          1 with value (4 79)
% 0.42/0.60  Evaluation took:
% 0.42/0.60    0.113 seconds of real time
% 0.42/0.60    0.107309 seconds of user run time
% 0.42/0.60    0.005052 seconds of system run time
% 0.42/0.60    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.42/0.60    0 page faults and
% 0.42/0.60    7,157,280 bytes consed.
% 0.42/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.60  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T18:47:12
% 0.42/0.60  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.60  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------