TSTP Solution File: SET959+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SET959+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:04:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SET959+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 17:07:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 12 Number of unprocessed: 12
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36 # 12 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are 5 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 5 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.36 # 5 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36 # 7 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # 5 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5
% 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 11 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36 # We now have 11 tableaux to operate on
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.37 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (empty(esk1_0))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (unordered_pair(X1,X2)=unordered_pair(X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (esk4_0!=esk3_0)).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (~empty(esk2_0))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~empty(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1))))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (unordered_pair(singleton(esk5_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1)))=X1|~in(X1,esk3_0))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (X1=X2|~in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X2)|~in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk3_0)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk4_0))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (X1=X2|in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1)|in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk4_0)|~in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk3_0))).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (unordered_pair(singleton(esk7_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk7_1(X1),esk8_1(X1)))=X1|~in(X1,esk4_0))).
% 0.18/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # Found 5 steps
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (esk4_0!=esk3_0), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (esk4_0!=esk3_0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_127, plain, (in(esk9_2(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk4_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_128, plain, (in(esk9_2(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk3_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_128, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38 cnf(i_0_130, plain, (~in(esk4_0,esk9_2(esk4_0,esk3_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_130, ...])).
% 0.18/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.38 # Child (24202) has found a proof.
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------