TSTP Solution File: SET959+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET959+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:36:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 46 ( 10 unt; 14 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 79 ( 28 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 81 ( 34 ~; 28 |; 13 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 14 ( 10 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 0 sgn; 37 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
esk5_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
esk6_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
esk7_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
esk8_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
esk9_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
fof(t112_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ! [X3] :
~ ( in(X3,X1)
& ! [X4,X5] : X3 != ordered_pair(X4,X5) )
& ! [X3] :
~ ( in(X3,X2)
& ! [X4,X5] : X3 != ordered_pair(X4,X5) )
& ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
<=> in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2) ) )
=> X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t112_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
fof(t2_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
<=> in(X3,X2) )
=> X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_tarski) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( ! [X3] :
~ ( in(X3,X1)
& ! [X4,X5] : X3 != ordered_pair(X4,X5) )
& ! [X3] :
~ ( in(X3,X2)
& ! [X4,X5] : X3 != ordered_pair(X4,X5) )
& ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
<=> in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2) ) )
=> X1 = X2 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t112_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X18,X21,X24,X25] :
( ( ~ in(X18,esk3_0)
| X18 = ordered_pair(esk5_1(X18),esk6_1(X18)) )
& ( ~ in(X21,esk4_0)
| X21 = ordered_pair(esk7_1(X21),esk8_1(X21)) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),esk3_0)
| in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),esk4_0) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(X24,X25),esk3_0) )
& esk3_0 != esk4_0 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X10,X11] : ordered_pair(X10,X11) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X10,X11),singleton(X10)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X8,X9] : unordered_pair(X8,X9) = unordered_pair(X9,X8),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = ordered_pair(esk7_1(X1),esk8_1(X1))
| ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk3_0)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk4_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk7_1(X1),esk8_1(X1)),singleton(esk7_1(X1)))
| ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk3_0)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( unordered_pair(singleton(esk7_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk7_1(X1),esk8_1(X1))) = X1
| ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X26,X27] :
( ( ~ in(esk9_2(X26,X27),X26)
| ~ in(esk9_2(X26,X27),X27)
| X26 = X27 )
& ( in(esk9_2(X26,X27),X26)
| in(esk9_2(X26,X27),X27)
| X26 = X27 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_tarski])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk3_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1)
| in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk4_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = ordered_pair(esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))
| ~ in(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( esk4_0 = X1
| in(esk9_2(esk4_0,X1),esk3_0)
| in(esk9_2(esk4_0,X1),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 != esk4_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk4_0)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),esk3_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1)),singleton(esk5_1(X1)))
| ~ in(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ in(esk9_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
in(esk9_2(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk4_0)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( unordered_pair(singleton(esk5_1(X1)),unordered_pair(esk5_1(X1),esk6_1(X1))) = X1
| ~ in(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk9_2(esk4_0,esk3_0),esk4_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk4_0)
| ~ in(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_26])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET959+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 12:38:10 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time : 0.010000 s
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time : 0.012000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------