TSTP Solution File: SET949+1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SET949+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:21:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   28 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   62 (  25   ~;  23   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   4 sgn;  28   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t102_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( in(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
        & ! [X4,X5] : ordered_pair(X4,X5) != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.STzcRbmKov/E---3.1_7775.p',t102_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d2_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = cartesian_product2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ? [X5,X6] :
              ( in(X5,X1)
              & in(X6,X2)
              & X4 = ordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.STzcRbmKov/E---3.1_7775.p',d2_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ~ ( in(X1,cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
          & ! [X4,X5] : ordered_pair(X4,X5) != X1 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t102_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14,X15,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X25,X26] :
      ( ( in(esk4_4(X12,X13,X14,X15),X12)
        | ~ in(X15,X14)
        | X14 != cartesian_product2(X12,X13) )
      & ( in(esk5_4(X12,X13,X14,X15),X13)
        | ~ in(X15,X14)
        | X14 != cartesian_product2(X12,X13) )
      & ( X15 = ordered_pair(esk4_4(X12,X13,X14,X15),esk5_4(X12,X13,X14,X15))
        | ~ in(X15,X14)
        | X14 != cartesian_product2(X12,X13) )
      & ( ~ in(X19,X12)
        | ~ in(X20,X13)
        | X18 != ordered_pair(X19,X20)
        | in(X18,X14)
        | X14 != cartesian_product2(X12,X13) )
      & ( ~ in(esk6_3(X21,X22,X23),X23)
        | ~ in(X25,X21)
        | ~ in(X26,X22)
        | esk6_3(X21,X22,X23) != ordered_pair(X25,X26)
        | X23 = cartesian_product2(X21,X22) )
      & ( in(esk7_3(X21,X22,X23),X21)
        | in(esk6_3(X21,X22,X23),X23)
        | X23 = cartesian_product2(X21,X22) )
      & ( in(esk8_3(X21,X22,X23),X22)
        | in(esk6_3(X21,X22,X23),X23)
        | X23 = cartesian_product2(X21,X22) )
      & ( esk6_3(X21,X22,X23) = ordered_pair(esk7_3(X21,X22,X23),esk8_3(X21,X22,X23))
        | in(esk6_3(X21,X22,X23),X23)
        | X23 = cartesian_product2(X21,X22) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_zfmisc_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X10,X11] :
      ( in(esk1_0,cartesian_product2(esk2_0,esk3_0))
      & ordered_pair(X10,X11) != esk1_0 ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( X1 = ordered_pair(esk4_4(X2,X3,X4,X1),esk5_4(X2,X3,X4,X1))
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | X4 != cartesian_product2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) != esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ordered_pair(esk4_4(X1,X2,cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X3),esk5_4(X1,X2,cartesian_product2(X1,X2),X3)) = X3
    | ~ in(X3,cartesian_product2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,cartesian_product2(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk1_0,cartesian_product2(X1,X2)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem    : SET949+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:32:00 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.STzcRbmKov/E---3.1_7775.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # sh5l with pid 7856 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/0.45  # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 7861 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/0.45  # Search class: FGHSS-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.45  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.45  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.18/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.18/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.18/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 52
% 0.18/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.18/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 47
% 0.18/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.18/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 59
% 0.18/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 48
% 0.18/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 53
% 0.18/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.18/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 15
% 0.18/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 0.18/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.18/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.18/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.18/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 0.18/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 48
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.18/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 48
% 0.18/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 0.18/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.18/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.18/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.18/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1590
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.45  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.45  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.45  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.18/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.18/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------