TSTP Solution File: SET947+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET947+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  20   ~;  21   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn;  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = powerset(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> subset(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2Im3jrBncn/E---3.1_14757.p',d1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2Im3jrBncn/E---3.1_14757.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(l50_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
     => subset(X1,union(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2Im3jrBncn/E---3.1_14757.p',l50_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t100_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : subset(X1,powerset(union(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2Im3jrBncn/E---3.1_14757.p',t100_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
        | subset(X8,X6)
        | X7 != powerset(X6) )
      & ( ~ subset(X9,X6)
        | in(X9,X7)
        | X7 != powerset(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X10,X11),X11)
        | ~ subset(esk1_2(X10,X11),X10)
        | X11 = powerset(X10) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X10,X11),X11)
        | subset(esk1_2(X10,X11),X10)
        | X11 = powerset(X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_zfmisc_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15,X16,X17] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X13,X14)
        | ~ in(X15,X13)
        | in(X15,X14) )
      & ( in(esk2_2(X16,X17),X16)
        | subset(X16,X17) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_2(X16,X17),X17)
        | subset(X16,X17) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | X3 != powerset(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( in(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ~ in(X19,X20)
      | subset(X19,union(X20)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l50_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : subset(X1,powerset(union(X1))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t100_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(esk2_2(X1,powerset(X2)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2))
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk5_0,powerset(union(esk5_0))),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X1,powerset(union(X2)))
    | ~ in(esk2_2(X1,powerset(union(X2))),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk5_0,powerset(union(esk5_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    subset(X1,powerset(union(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : SET947+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 17:36:26 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.43  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.2Im3jrBncn/E---3.1_14757.p
% 0.14/0.44  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 14835 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 14840 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.14/0.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.14/0.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.14/0.44  # Processed clauses                    : 73
% 0.14/0.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.14/0.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 70
% 0.14/0.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.14/0.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.14/0.44  # Generated clauses                    : 71
% 0.14/0.44  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 59
% 0.14/0.44  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Paramodulations                      : 69
% 0.14/0.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.14/0.44  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.14/0.44  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 54
% 0.14/0.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.14/0.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 25
% 0.14/0.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 26
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.14/0.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 30
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 14
% 0.14/0.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 101
% 0.14/0.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 92
% 0.14/0.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.14/0.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.14/0.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.14/0.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2311
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.44  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1736 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.14/0.44  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.14/0.44  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------