TSTP Solution File: SET945+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SET945+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:33:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 198.67s 199.02s
% Output   : Refutation 198.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SET945+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 02:06:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.46/1.02  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.46/1.02  Process 2769 was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.46/1.02  Sun Jul 10 02:06:41 2022
% 0.46/1.02  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_2615_n023.cluster.edu".
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_2615_n023.cluster.edu
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.46/1.02  set(auto2).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.46/1.02      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.46/1.02      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.46/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.46/1.02  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.46/1.02  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.46/1.02  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.46/1.02  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.46/1.02  clear(print_given).
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (10 formulas)
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.46/1.02  1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  2 (all A all B set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  3 (all A all B all C (C = set_intersection2(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> in(D,A) & in(D,B))))) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  4 (all A all B (B = union(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D (in(C,D) & in(D,A))))))) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  5 (all A all B set_intersection2(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  6 (exists A empty(A)) # label(rc1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  7 (exists A -empty(A)) # label(rc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  8 (all A all B (disjoint(A,B) -> disjoint(B,A))) # label(symmetry_r1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  9 (all A all B (-(-disjoint(A,B) & (all C -in(C,set_intersection2(A,B)))) & -((exists C in(C,set_intersection2(A,B))) & disjoint(A,B)))) # label(t4_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  10 -(all A all B ((all C (in(C,A) -> disjoint(C,B))) -> disjoint(union(A),B))) # label(t98_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  % Assigning unary symbol union kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (15).
% 0.46/1.02  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. set_intersection2=1. f3=1. f4=1. f5=1. f1=1. f2=1. union=0.
% 0.46/1.02  
% 0.46/1.02  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=43.000, iters=3393
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=29.000, iters=3359
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=27.000, iters=3337
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=26.000, iters=3348
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=25.000, iters=3341
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=23.000, iters=3335
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=22.000, iters=3390
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=21.000, iters=3337
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=20.000, iters=3367
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=19.000, iters=3335
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=18.000, iters=3352
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=7109, wt=50.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=2628, wt=48.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=6289, wt=44.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=6297, wt=40.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=7145, wt=39.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=5968, wt=38.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=6293, wt=37.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=6304, wt=35.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=6160, wt=34.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=7311, wt=33.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=8145, wt=32.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=17.000, iters=3341
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=7149, wt=31.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=7949, wt=30.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=16.000, iters=3335
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=8206, wt=29.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=8146, wt=28.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=8299, wt=27.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=15.000, iters=3429
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=15371, wt=22.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=15402, wt=14.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=15404, wt=13.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (displace): id=16171, wt=12.000
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Low Water (keep): wt=14.000, iters=3334
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 198.67/199.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 198.67/199.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  % Proof 1 at 197.34 (+ 0.64) seconds.
% 198.67/199.02  % Length of proof is 81.
% 198.67/199.02  % Level of proof is 19.
% 198.67/199.02  % Maximum clause weight is 23.000.
% 198.67/199.02  % Given clauses 3986.
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 198.67/199.02  2 (all A all B set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 198.67/199.02  3 (all A all B all C (C = set_intersection2(A,B) <-> (all D (in(D,C) <-> in(D,A) & in(D,B))))) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 198.67/199.02  4 (all A all B (B = union(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> (exists D (in(C,D) & in(D,A))))))) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 198.67/199.02  5 (all A all B set_intersection2(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 198.67/199.02  9 (all A all B (-(-disjoint(A,B) & (all C -in(C,set_intersection2(A,B)))) & -((exists C in(C,set_intersection2(A,B))) & disjoint(A,B)))) # label(t4_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 198.67/199.02  10 -(all A all B ((all C (in(C,A) -> disjoint(C,B))) -> disjoint(union(A),B))) # label(t98_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 198.67/199.02  12 set_intersection2(A,A) = A # label(idempotence_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(5)].
% 198.67/199.02  13 set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(B,A) # label(commutativity_k3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 198.67/199.02  14 disjoint(A,B) | in(f5(A,B),set_intersection2(A,B)) # label(t4_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 198.67/199.02  15 union(A) = B | in(f3(A,B),B) | in(f4(A,B),A) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 198.67/199.02  17 set_intersection2(A,B) = C | in(f1(A,B,C),C) | in(f1(A,B,C),A) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 198.67/199.02  18 set_intersection2(A,B) = C | in(f1(A,B,C),C) | in(f1(A,B,C),B) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 198.67/199.02  20 -disjoint(union(c3),c4) # label(t98_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(10)].
% 198.67/199.02  21 -in(A,B) | -in(B,A) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 198.67/199.02  22 -in(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) | -disjoint(B,C) # label(t4_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 198.67/199.02  24 -in(A,c3) | disjoint(A,c4) # label(t98_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(10)].
% 198.67/199.02  25 set_intersection2(A,B) != C | -in(D,C) | in(D,A) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 198.67/199.02  26 set_intersection2(A,B) != C | -in(D,C) | in(D,B) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 198.67/199.02  27 union(A) != B | -in(C,B) | in(C,f2(A,B,C)) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 198.67/199.02  28 union(A) != B | -in(C,B) | in(f2(A,B,C),A) # label(d4_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 198.67/199.02  30 set_intersection2(A,B) != C | in(D,C) | -in(D,A) | -in(D,B) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 198.67/199.02  32 set_intersection2(A,B) = C | -in(f1(A,B,C),C) | -in(f1(A,B,C),A) | -in(f1(A,B,C),B) # label(d3_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 198.67/199.02  33 set_intersection2(A,B) = A | in(f1(A,B,A),A).  [factor(17,b,c)].
% 198.67/199.02  34 set_intersection2(A,B) = B | in(f1(A,B,B),B).  [factor(18,b,c)].
% 198.67/199.02  35 -in(A,A).  [factor(21,a,b)].
% 198.67/199.02  36 A != B | in(C,B) | -in(C,A).  [factor(30,c,d),rewrite([12(1)])].
% 198.67/199.02  38 set_intersection2(A,B) = A | -in(f1(A,B,A),A) | -in(f1(A,B,A),B).  [factor(32,b,c)].
% 198.67/199.02  40 A = B | -in(f1(A,A,B),B) | -in(f1(A,A,B),A).  [factor(32,c,d),rewrite([12(1)])].
% 198.67/199.02  41 in(f5(union(c3),c4),set_intersection2(c4,union(c3))).  [resolve(20,a,14,a),rewrite([13(8)])].
% 198.67/199.02  49 -in(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) | in(f5(B,C),set_intersection2(B,C)).  [resolve(22,b,14,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  59 set_intersection2(A,B) != C | in(f1(D,C,E),A) | set_intersection2(C,D) = E | in(f1(D,C,E),E).  [resolve(25,b,18,c),rewrite([13(5)])].
% 198.67/199.02  60 set_intersection2(A,B) != C | in(f1(D,E,C),A) | set_intersection2(D,E) = C | in(f1(D,E,C),E).  [resolve(25,b,18,b)].
% 198.67/199.02  157 -in(A,set_intersection2(A,B)).  [ur(26,a,13,a,c,35,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  173 set_intersection2(A,B) = A | -in(f1(A,B,A),B).  [resolve(38,b,33,b),merge(c)].
% 198.67/199.02  181 set_intersection2(c4,union(c3)) != set_intersection2(A,B) | in(f5(union(c3),c4),B).  [resolve(41,a,26,b),flip(a)].
% 198.67/199.02  230 -in(A,B) | in(f5(B,B),B).  [para(12(a,1),49(a,2)),rewrite([12(3)])].
% 198.67/199.02  231 -in(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) | in(f5(C,B),set_intersection2(B,C)).  [para(13(a,1),49(a,2)),rewrite([13(4)])].
% 198.67/199.02  233 in(f5(A,A),A) | set_intersection2(A,B) = A.  [resolve(230,a,34,b),rewrite([13(3)])].
% 198.67/199.02  239 in(f5(A,A),A) | union(A) = B | in(f3(A,B),B).  [resolve(230,a,15,c)].
% 198.67/199.02  382 in(f5(union(c3),c4),c4).  [resolve(181,a,13,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  383 in(f5(union(c3),c4),union(c3)).  [xx_res(181,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  387 set_intersection2(A,c4) != B | in(f5(union(c3),c4),B) | -in(f5(union(c3),c4),A).  [resolve(382,a,30,d)].
% 198.67/199.02  455 union(c3) != union(A) | in(f2(A,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4)),A).  [resolve(383,a,28,b),flip(a)].
% 198.67/199.02  456 union(c3) != union(A) | in(f5(union(c3),c4),f2(A,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4))).  [resolve(383,a,27,b),flip(a)].
% 198.67/199.02  515 in(f1(A,set_intersection2(B,C),D),B) | set_intersection2(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) = D | in(f1(A,set_intersection2(B,C),D),D).  [resolve(59,a,12,a(flip)),rewrite([12(3),12(6),13(5),12(9)])].
% 198.67/199.02  518 in(f1(A,set_intersection2(B,C),B),B) | set_intersection2(A,set_intersection2(B,C)) = B.  [factor(515,a,c)].
% 198.67/199.02  536 in(f1(A,B,set_intersection2(C,D)),D) | set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(C,D) | in(f1(A,B,set_intersection2(C,D)),B).  [resolve(60,a,13,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  539 in(f1(A,B,set_intersection2(B,C)),B) | set_intersection2(B,C) = set_intersection2(A,B).  [factor(536,a,c),rewrite([13(1),13(5)]),flip(b)].
% 198.67/199.02  751 in(f5(A,A),A) | union(A) = B | in(f5(B,B),B).  [resolve(239,c,230,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  766 in(f5(A,A),A) | union(A) = A.  [factor(751,a,c)].
% 198.67/199.02  1153 in(f2(c3,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4)),c3).  [xx_res(455,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1154 in(f5(c3,c3),c3).  [resolve(1153,a,230,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1164 disjoint(f2(c3,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4)),c4).  [resolve(1153,a,24,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1187 disjoint(f5(c3,c3),c4).  [resolve(1154,a,24,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1193 set_intersection2(A,f5(c3,c3)) != c3.  [ur(36,b,157,a,c,1154,a),rewrite([13(5)]),flip(a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1202 -in(A,set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3))).  [resolve(1187,a,22,b),rewrite([13(5)])].
% 198.67/199.02  1205 -in(f1(c3,f5(c3,c3),c3),f5(c3,c3)).  [ur(173,a,1193,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1220 -in(A,set_intersection2(c4,f2(c3,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4)))).  [resolve(1164,a,22,b),rewrite([13(10)])].
% 198.67/199.02  1221 union(set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3))) = set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3)).  [resolve(1202,a,766,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1223 set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3)) = A | in(f5(A,A),A).  [resolve(1202,a,751,a),rewrite([1221(6)])].
% 198.67/199.02  1226 set_intersection2(A,set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3))) = set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3)).  [resolve(1202,a,233,a),rewrite([13(6)])].
% 198.67/199.02  1567 set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3)) = set_intersection2(A,B) | in(f5(B,A),set_intersection2(A,B)).  [resolve(1223,b,231,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1873 set_intersection2(A,B) = A | -in(f1(set_intersection2(A,B),set_intersection2(A,B),A),set_intersection2(A,B)).  [resolve(518,a,40,b),rewrite([12(3)]),merge(b)].
% 198.67/199.02  1895 in(f1(c3,f5(c3,c3),c3),c3).  [resolve(1205,a,18,c),unit_del(a,1193)].
% 198.67/199.02  1949 disjoint(f1(c3,f5(c3,c3),c3),c4).  [resolve(1895,a,24,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  1956 -in(A,set_intersection2(c4,f1(c3,f5(c3,c3),c3))).  [resolve(1949,a,22,b),rewrite([13(8)])].
% 198.67/199.02  2018 set_intersection2(A,B) = set_intersection2(A,C) | in(f5(A,A),A).  [resolve(539,a,230,a),rewrite([13(2)])].
% 198.67/199.02  2021 set_intersection2(A,set_intersection2(A,B)) = set_intersection2(A,B).  [resolve(539,a,173,b),rewrite([13(3),13(6)]),flip(a),merge(b)].
% 198.67/199.02  2810 set_intersection2(A,set_intersection2(c4,f1(c3,f5(c3,c3),c3))) = set_intersection2(B,set_intersection2(c4,f1(c3,f5(c3,c3),c3))).  [resolve(1956,a,2018,b),rewrite([13(9),13(18)])].
% 198.67/199.02  2812 set_intersection2(c4,f1(c3,f5(c3,c3),c3)) = set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3)).  [resolve(1956,a,1223,b),flip(a)].
% 198.67/199.02  2820 set_intersection2(c4,f5(c3,c3)) = c_0.  [new_symbol(2810),rewrite([2812(8),1226(6)])].
% 198.67/199.02  2823 -in(A,c_0).  [back_rewrite(1956),rewrite([2812(8),2820(5)])].
% 198.67/199.02  3005 set_intersection2(A,B) = c_0 | in(f5(B,A),set_intersection2(A,B)).  [back_rewrite(1567),rewrite([2820(5)]),flip(a)].
% 198.67/199.02  4210 set_intersection2(A,B) = c_0 | set_intersection2(C,D) != set_intersection2(A,B) | in(f5(B,A),C).  [resolve(3005,b,25,b)].
% 198.67/199.02  16773 in(f5(union(c3),c4),f2(c3,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4))).  [xx_res(456,a)].
% 198.67/199.02  16788 set_intersection2(c4,f2(c3,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4))) != c_0.  [ur(387,b,2823,a,c,16773,a),rewrite([13(10)])].
% 198.67/199.02  17206 set_intersection2(A,B) = A | in(f1(set_intersection2(A,B),set_intersection2(A,B),A),A).  [resolve(1873,b,18,c),rewrite([12(5)]),merge(b)].
% 198.67/199.02  18817 set_intersection2(A,B) = c_0 | in(f5(set_intersection2(A,B),A),A).  [resolve(4210,b,2021,a(flip)),rewrite([2021(2)])].
% 198.67/199.02  20526 set_intersection2(A,set_intersection2(c4,f2(c3,union(c3),f5(union(c3),c4)))) = c_0.  [resolve(1220,a,18817,b),rewrite([13(11)])].
% 198.67/199.02  20527 $F.  [resolve(1220,a,17206,b),rewrite([13(11),20526(11)]),flip(a),unit_del(a,16788)].
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  % SZS output end Refutation
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Given=3986. Generated=1148313. Kept=20516. proofs=1.
% 198.67/199.02  Usable=3907. Sos=9996. Demods=164. Limbo=2, Disabled=6633. Hints=0.
% 198.67/199.02  Megabytes=16.86.
% 198.67/199.02  User_CPU=197.34, System_CPU=0.64, Wall_clock=198.
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  ============================== end of search =========================
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  THEOREM PROVED
% 198.67/199.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 198.67/199.02  
% 198.67/199.02  Process 2769 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jul 10 02:09:59 2022
% 198.67/199.03  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------