TSTP Solution File: SET942+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET942+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:23 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.75s 2.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   6 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  24   ~;  23   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   17 (   9   >;   8   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (;  42   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > empty > #nlpp > union > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_6 > #skF_5 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(union,type,
    union: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_55,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

tff(f_38,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

tff(f_48,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( B = union(A) )
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> ? [D] :
              ( in(C,D)
              & in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

tff(f_60,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( subset(A,B)
       => subset(union(A),union(B)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t95_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [A_27] : subset(A_27,A_27),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [A_3,B_4] :
      ( in('#skF_1'(A_3,B_4),A_3)
      | subset(A_3,B_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [C_23,A_8] :
      ( in(C_23,'#skF_5'(A_8,union(A_8),C_23))
      | ~ in(C_23,union(A_8)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    subset('#skF_8','#skF_9'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ! [A_44,C_45] :
      ( in('#skF_5'(A_44,union(A_44),C_45),A_44)
      | ~ in(C_45,union(A_44)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [C_7,B_4,A_3] :
      ( in(C_7,B_4)
      | ~ in(C_7,A_3)
      | ~ subset(A_3,B_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_200,plain,
    ! [A_72,C_73,B_74] :
      ( in('#skF_5'(A_72,union(A_72),C_73),B_74)
      | ~ subset(A_72,B_74)
      | ~ in(C_73,union(A_72)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_4]) ).

tff(c_1861,plain,
    ! [A_253,C_254,B_255,B_256] :
      ( in('#skF_5'(A_253,union(A_253),C_254),B_255)
      | ~ subset(B_256,B_255)
      | ~ subset(A_253,B_256)
      | ~ in(C_254,union(A_253)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_200,c_4]) ).

tff(c_1874,plain,
    ! [A_257,C_258] :
      ( in('#skF_5'(A_257,union(A_257),C_258),'#skF_9')
      | ~ subset(A_257,'#skF_8')
      | ~ in(C_258,union(A_257)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_1861]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [C_23,A_8,D_26] :
      ( in(C_23,union(A_8))
      | ~ in(D_26,A_8)
      | ~ in(C_23,D_26) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_3217,plain,
    ! [C_327,A_328,C_329] :
      ( in(C_327,union('#skF_9'))
      | ~ in(C_327,'#skF_5'(A_328,union(A_328),C_329))
      | ~ subset(A_328,'#skF_8')
      | ~ in(C_329,union(A_328)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1874,c_10]) ).

tff(c_3328,plain,
    ! [C_331,A_332] :
      ( in(C_331,union('#skF_9'))
      | ~ subset(A_332,'#skF_8')
      | ~ in(C_331,union(A_332)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_3217]) ).

tff(c_3575,plain,
    ! [A_343,B_344] :
      ( in('#skF_1'(union(A_343),B_344),union('#skF_9'))
      | ~ subset(A_343,'#skF_8')
      | subset(union(A_343),B_344) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_3328]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_3,B_4] :
      ( ~ in('#skF_1'(A_3,B_4),B_4)
      | subset(A_3,B_4) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_3604,plain,
    ! [A_345] :
      ( ~ subset(A_345,'#skF_8')
      | subset(union(A_345),union('#skF_9')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3575,c_6]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ~ subset(union('#skF_8'),union('#skF_9')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_3624,plain,
    ~ subset('#skF_8','#skF_8'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3604,c_34]) ).

tff(c_3636,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_32,c_3624]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET942+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 16:46:48 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.75/2.67  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.75/2.67  
% 6.75/2.67  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.96/2.70  
% 6.96/2.70  Inference rules
% 6.96/2.70  ----------------------
% 6.96/2.70  #Ref     : 0
% 6.96/2.70  #Sup     : 825
% 6.96/2.70  #Fact    : 0
% 6.96/2.70  #Define  : 0
% 6.96/2.70  #Split   : 3
% 6.96/2.70  #Chain   : 0
% 6.96/2.70  #Close   : 0
% 6.96/2.70  
% 6.96/2.70  Ordering : KBO
% 6.96/2.70  
% 6.96/2.70  Simplification rules
% 6.96/2.70  ----------------------
% 6.96/2.70  #Subsume      : 61
% 6.96/2.70  #Demod        : 13
% 6.96/2.70  #Tautology    : 11
% 6.96/2.70  #SimpNegUnit  : 7
% 6.96/2.70  #BackRed      : 8
% 6.96/2.70  
% 6.96/2.70  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.96/2.70  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.96/2.70  
% 6.96/2.70  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.96/2.70  ----------------------
% 6.96/2.70  Preprocessing        : 0.49
% 6.96/2.70  Parsing              : 0.26
% 6.96/2.70  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 6.96/2.70  Main loop            : 1.16
% 6.96/2.70  Inferencing          : 0.39
% 6.96/2.70  Reduction            : 0.25
% 6.96/2.70  Demodulation         : 0.15
% 6.96/2.70  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 6.96/2.70  Subsumption          : 0.39
% 6.96/2.70  Abstraction          : 0.05
% 6.96/2.70  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.96/2.70  Cooper               : 0.00
% 6.96/2.70  Total                : 1.69
% 6.96/2.70  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.96/2.70  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.96/2.70  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.96/2.70  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------