TSTP Solution File: SET931+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SET931+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:05:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
( sPE(set_difference(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)),empty_set)
| sPE(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
| sPE(sK2,empty_set)
| sPE(sK2,singleton(sK3))
| sPE(sK2,singleton(sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t75_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_difference(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)),empty_set)
| ~ sPE(sK2,empty_set) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t75_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_difference(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)),empty_set)
| ~ sPE(sK2,singleton(sK3)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t75_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_difference(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)),empty_set)
| ~ sPE(sK2,singleton(sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t75_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_difference(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)),empty_set)
| ~ sPE(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t75_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
| sPE(set_difference(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)),empty_set) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
| sPE(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
| sPE(sK2,empty_set)
| sPE(sK2,singleton(sK3))
| sPE(sK2,singleton(sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4))
| subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK2,singleton(sK4))
| subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK2,singleton(sK3))
| subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_difference(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)),empty_set)
| subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK2,empty_set)
| subset(sK2,unordered_pair(sK3,sK4)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l46_zfmisc_1)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET931+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 22:00:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % symbols: 13
% 0.12/0.34 % clauses: 25
% 0.12/0.34 % start clauses: 5
% 0.12/0.34 % iterative deepening steps: 57
% 0.12/0.34 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.12/0.34 % literal attempts: 3029
% 0.12/0.34 % depth failures: 2144
% 0.12/0.34 % regularity failures: 27
% 0.12/0.34 % tautology failures: 34
% 0.12/0.34 % reductions: 253
% 0.12/0.34 % extensions: 2547
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT variables: 729
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT clauses: 867
% 0.12/0.34 % WalkSAT solutions: 860
% 0.12/0.34 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------