TSTP Solution File: SET930+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:13:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.55s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   7 unt;   3 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (   9 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X,Y),Z) = singleton(X)
    | in(X,Z)
    | ~ in(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l39_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X,Y),Z) = unordered_pair(X,Y)
    | in(X,Z)
    | in(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X,Y),Z) = empty_set
    | ~ in(X,Z)
    | ~ in(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t73_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(13,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') != empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(14,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') != singleton('SKOLEMAAAV3'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(15,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') != singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(16,negated_conjecture,
    set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') != unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(X,Y),Z) = unordered_pair(X,Y)
    | in(Y,Z)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(U,X),Z) = singleton(U)
    | in(U,Z) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,10]) ).

cnf(257,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV4','SKOLEMAAAV5'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,16,15]) ).

cnf(259,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV5'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,16,14]) ).

cnf(295,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,257,13]),259]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 21:30:56 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T21:30:56
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T21:30:56
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.55/0.76  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  #||
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.76  ||#
% 0.55/0.76  
% 0.55/0.76  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.55/0.76  ;      1051 formulas have been input or derived (from 82 formulas).
% 0.55/0.76  ;       295 (28%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.55/0.76  ;           49 (17%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.55/0.76  ;          246 (83%) are still being kept.
% 0.55/0.76  ; 
% 0.55/0.76  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.002   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (9 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.037  13%   Process new row              (858 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.023   8%   Resolution                   (162 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.011   4%   Paramodulation               (81 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (20 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.027  10%   Condensing                   (582 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.046  17%   Forward subsumption          (582 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.008   3%   Backward subsumption         (241 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.047  17%   Clause clause subsumption    (2,020 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.033  12%   Forward simplification       (838 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.007   3%   Backward simplification      (295 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.006   2%   Ordering                     (2,316 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.031  11%   Other
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.278        Total
% 0.55/0.76  ;     0.280        Real time
% 0.55/0.76  ; 
% 0.55/0.76  ; Term-hash-array has 528 terms in all.
% 0.55/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 193 entries (193 at peak, 241 added, 48 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,966 nodes (2,267 at peak, 2,474 added, 508 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76  ;  Retrieved 3,355 possibly forward subsuming rows in 582 calls.
% 0.55/0.76  ;  Retrieved 165 possibly backward subsumed rows in 241 calls.
% 0.55/0.76  ; Path-index has 446 entries (447 at peak, 550 added, 104 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76  ; Path-index has 624 nodes (657 at peak, 678 added, 54 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76  ; Trie-index has 446 entries (447 at peak, 550 added, 104 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76  ; Trie-index has 1,792 nodes (1,962 at peak, 2,013 added, 221 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76  ; Retrieved 3,084 generalization terms in 5,902 calls.
% 0.55/0.76  ; Retrieved 99 instance terms in 53 calls.
% 0.55/0.76  ; Retrieved 6,210 unifiable terms in 874 calls.
% 0.55/0.76  ; 
% 0.55/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to process has 41 entries:
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value 7               2 with value 18               4 with value 29
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value 9               6 with value 19               4 with value 30
% 0.55/0.76  ;     2 with value 13              1 with value 23               1 with value 34
% 0.55/0.76  ;     3 with value 14              1 with value 24               1 with value 35
% 0.55/0.76  ;     4 with value 15              1 with value 25               1 with value 37
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value 16              2 with value 27               4 with value 40
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value 17
% 0.55/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to give has 174 entries:
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value (4 6)          12 with value (4 39)           3 with value (4 51)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value (4 7)           8 with value (4 40)           1 with value (4 52)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value (4 15)          6 with value (4 41)           4 with value (4 53)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value (4 28)          8 with value (4 42)           9 with value (4 54)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     1 with value (4 31)          9 with value (4 43)           3 with value (4 55)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     4 with value (4 32)          8 with value (4 44)           5 with value (4 56)
% 0.55/0.76  ;    10 with value (4 33)          4 with value (4 45)           2 with value (4 58)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     7 with value (4 34)          7 with value (4 46)           1 with value (4 59)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     2 with value (4 35)          8 with value (4 47)           2 with value (4 60)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     4 with value (4 36)          5 with value (4 48)           2 with value (4 61)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     5 with value (4 37)          7 with value (4 49)           2 with value (4 64)
% 0.55/0.76  ;     5 with value (4 38)         13 with value (4 50)           3 with value (4 66)
% 0.55/0.76  Evaluation took:
% 0.55/0.76    0.281 seconds of real time
% 0.55/0.76    0.262997 seconds of user run time
% 0.55/0.76    0.017685 seconds of system run time
% 0.55/0.76    [Run times include 0.006 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.55/0.76    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.55/0.76    0 page faults and
% 0.55/0.76    21,305,008 bytes consed.
% 0.55/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.76  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T21:30:57
% 0.55/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.76  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------