TSTP Solution File: SET929+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SET929+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.75s 1.95s
% Output   : Refutation 1.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   6 unt;   4 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (   8 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( set_difference(A,B) != empty_set
    | subset(A,B) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( set_difference(A,B) = empty_set
    | ~ subset(A,B) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    | in(A,C) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    | in(B,C) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    | ~ in(A,C)
    | ~ in(B,C) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) != empty_set
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) = empty_set
    | in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) = empty_set
    | in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    file('SET929+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,plain,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3) != empty_set
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,8]),
    [iquote('para_from,12.1.1,8.1.1.1')] ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3)
    | in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[16,3]),11]),
    [iquote('para_from,16.1.1,3.1.1,unit_del,11')] ).

cnf(36,plain,
    in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[32,5])]),
    [iquote('hyper,32,5,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(44,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3)
    | in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,3]),11]),
    [iquote('para_from,17.1.1,3.1.1,unit_del,11')] ).

cnf(45,plain,
    in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[44,6])]),
    [iquote('hyper,44,6,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(48,plain,
    subset(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[45,7,36]),
    [iquote('hyper,45,7,36')] ).

cnf(52,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[23,4]),11,36,45,48]),
    [iquote('para_into,23.1.1,4.1.1,unit_del,11,36,45,48')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SET929+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 10:31:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.75/1.95  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.75/1.95  The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 1.75/1.95  Wed Jul 27 10:31:07 2022
% 1.75/1.95  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 23416.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.75/1.95  set(auto).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.75/1.95  clear(print_given).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  formula_list(usable).
% 1.75/1.95  all A (A=A).
% 1.75/1.95  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.75/1.95  all A B (unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 1.75/1.95  empty(empty_set).
% 1.75/1.95  exists A empty(A).
% 1.75/1.95  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.75/1.95  all A B subset(A,A).
% 1.75/1.95  all A B (set_difference(A,B)=empty_set<->subset(A,B)).
% 1.75/1.95  all A B C (subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)<->in(A,C)&in(B,C)).
% 1.75/1.95  -(all A B C (set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C)=empty_set<->in(A,C)&in(B,C))).
% 1.75/1.95  end_of_list.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  list(usable).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] A=A.
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] empty($c1).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)|in(A,C).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] -subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)|in(B,C).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)| -in(A,C)| -in(B,C).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=empty_set|in($c5,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=empty_set|in($c4,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95  0 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)!=empty_set| -in($c5,$c3)| -in($c4,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95  end_of_list.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.75/1.95  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.75/1.95  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.75/1.95  clauses in usable.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.75/1.95     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ------------> process usable:
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 2 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 4 [] set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 5 [] -subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)|in(A,C).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 6 [] -subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)|in(B,C).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 7 [] subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)| -in(A,C)| -in(B,C).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=13): 8 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)!=empty_set| -in($c5,$c3)| -in($c4,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ------------> process sos:
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] A=A.
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 12 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 13 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 14 [] empty($c1).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 15 [] subset(A,A).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 16 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=empty_set|in($c5,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 17 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=empty_set|in($c4,$c3).
% 1.75/1.95    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.75/1.95    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 52 [para_into,23.1.1,4.1.1,unit_del,11,36,45,48] $F.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.75/1.95  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.75/1.95  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.75/1.95  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ============ end of search ============
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.75/1.95  clauses given                 21
% 1.75/1.95  clauses generated             96
% 1.75/1.95  clauses kept                  45
% 1.75/1.95  clauses forward subsumed      65
% 1.75/1.95  clauses back subsumed         11
% 1.75/1.95  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.75/1.95  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.75/1.95  
% 1.75/1.95  Process 23416 finished Wed Jul 27 10:31:08 2022
% 1.75/1.95  Otter interrupted
% 1.75/1.95  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------