TSTP Solution File: SET928+1 by lazyCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 02:49:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.90s 0.82s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 19:00:41 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.90/0.82  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.90/0.82  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(sK2,sK4) | unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c1, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(sK2,sK4) | unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) | in(X1,X2) | in(X0,X2)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	sK2 = X0).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	sK4 = X2).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c3, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c4, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) | in(X1,X2),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c5, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(X4,X3)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X4,X3)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c6, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	in(X1,X2),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c7, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c8, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	X5 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) | disjoint(X5,X2),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X5 = unordered_pair(X3,X4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c9, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(X5,X2),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a3])], [c8])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c10, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(X6,X7) | ~disjoint(unordered_pair(X6,X8),X7)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X5 = unordered_pair(X6,X8)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X2 = X7).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c11, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c9, c10])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c12, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(X6,X7),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c9, c10])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c13, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	in(sK3,sK4) | in(sK2,sK4) | unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) != set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X6 = sK3).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X7 = sK4).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c14, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c12, c13])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c15, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	in(sK2,sK4) | unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) != set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c12, c13])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c16, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(sK2,sK4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	sK2 = sK2).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	sK4 = sK4).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c17, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) != set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c15, c16])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c18, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	set_difference(X9,X10) = X9 | ~disjoint(X9,X10)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4) = set_difference(X9,X10)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c19, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c17, c18])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c20, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	~disjoint(X9,X10),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c17, c18])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c21, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	X11 != X9 | unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) != X11,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a10])], [c17, c18])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X11 = X9).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c22, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) != X11,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a11])], [c21])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = X11).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c23, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a12])], [c22])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c24, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a13, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X9 = unordered_pair(X0,X1)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a14, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X10 = X2).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c25, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a13, a14])], [c20, c24])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c26, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(sK3,sK4) | unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a15, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X1 = sK3).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a16, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X2 = sK4).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c27, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15, a16])], [c6, c26])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c28, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15, a16])], [c6, c26])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c29, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(X12,X13) | set_difference(X12,X13) != X12).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a17, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	set_difference(X12,X13) = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a18, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = X14).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c30, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a17, a18])], [c28, c29])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c31, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(X12,X13),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a17, a18])], [c28, c29])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c32, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	X14 != X12,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a17, a18])], [c28, c29])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a19, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X14 = X12).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c33, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a19])], [c32])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c34, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	~disjoint(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a20, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X12 = unordered_pair(X0,X1)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a21, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X13 = X2).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c35, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a20, a21])], [c31, c34])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c36, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(X15,X16) | set_difference(X15,X16) != X15).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a22, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	set_difference(X15,X16) = set_difference(unordered_pair(sK2,sK3),sK4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a23, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	unordered_pair(sK2,sK3) = X17).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c37, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a22, a23])], [c3, c36])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c38, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	disjoint(X15,X16),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a22, a23])], [c3, c36])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c39, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	X17 != X15,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a22, a23])], [c3, c36])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a24, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X17 = X15).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c40, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a24])], [c39])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c41, axiom,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(X18,X19) | ~disjoint(unordered_pair(X18,X20),X19)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a25, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X15 = unordered_pair(X18,X20)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a26, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X16 = X19).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c42, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a25, a26])], [c38, c41])).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c43, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	~in(X18,X19),
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a25, a26])], [c38, c41])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c44, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	in(sK2,sK4)).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a27, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X18 = sK2).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(a28, assumption,
% 3.90/0.82  	X19 = sK4).
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c45, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a27, a28])], [c43, c44])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  cnf(c46, plain,
% 3.90/0.82  	$false,
% 3.90/0.82  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X0, sK2),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X1, sK3),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X2, sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X3, sK3),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X4, sK2),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X5, unordered_pair(X3,X4)),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X6, sK3),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X7, sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X8, sK2),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X9, unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X10, sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X11, unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X12, unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X13, sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X14, unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X15, unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X16, sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X17, unordered_pair(sK2,sK3)),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X18, sK2),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X19, sK4),
% 3.90/0.82  		bind(X20, sK3)
% 3.90/0.82  	],
% 3.90/0.82  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15, a16, a17, a18, a19, a20, a21, a22, a23, a24, a25, a26, a27, a28])).
% 3.90/0.82  
% 3.90/0.82  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------