TSTP Solution File: SET928+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2hGQASZZSG true
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:16:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 7 unt; 7 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 14 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 226 ( 28 ~; 20 |; 5 &; 170 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 9 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 ^; 34 !; 0 ?; 34 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__3_type,type,
sk__3: $i ).
thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(disjoint_type,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__4_type,type,
sk__4: $i ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(set_difference_type,type,
set_difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(t83_xboole_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
<=> ( ( set_difference @ A @ B )
= A ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( set_difference @ X0 @ X1 )
= X0 )
| ~ ( disjoint @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t83_xboole_1]) ).
thf(t72_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( ~ ( in @ A @ C )
& ~ ( in @ B @ C ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( ~ ( in @ A @ C )
& ~ ( in @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t72_zfmisc_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
( ( in @ sk__3 @ sk__4 )
| ( in @ sk__2 @ sk__4 )
| ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
!= ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl63,plain,
( ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
| ( in @ sk__3 @ sk__4 )
| ( in @ sk__2 @ sk__4 )
| ( ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 )
!= ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl10,zip_derived_cl9]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl64,plain,
( ( in @ sk__2 @ sk__4 )
| ( in @ sk__3 @ sk__4 )
| ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 ) ),
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl63]) ).
thf(t55_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
& ( in @ A @ C ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
| ~ ( in @ X0 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t55_zfmisc_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl65,plain,
( ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
| ( in @ sk__3 @ sk__4 ) ),
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl64,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ X1 @ X0 )
= ( unordered_pair @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5_001,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
| ~ ( in @ X0 @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t55_zfmisc_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl53,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 )
| ~ ( in @ X0 @ X2 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl66,plain,
~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 ),
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl65,zip_derived_cl53]) ).
thf(t57_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( in @ A @ B )
& ~ ( in @ C @ B )
& ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl6,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ X0 @ X2 ) @ X1 )
| ( in @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t57_zfmisc_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl66_002,plain,
~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 ),
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl65,zip_derived_cl53]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl67,plain,
( ( in @ sk__3 @ sk__4 )
| ( in @ sk__2 @ sk__4 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl6,zip_derived_cl66]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
( ~ ( in @ sk__3 @ sk__4 )
| ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
= ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl69,plain,
( ( in @ sk__2 @ sk__4 )
| ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
= ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl67,zip_derived_cl8]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
( ~ ( in @ sk__2 @ sk__4 )
| ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
= ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl70,plain,
( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
= ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ),
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl69,zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( ( set_difference @ X0 @ X1 )
!= X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t83_xboole_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl71,plain,
( ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4 )
| ( ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 )
!= ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl70,zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl72,plain,
disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__3 ) @ sk__4,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl71]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl78,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl66,zip_derived_cl72]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2hGQASZZSG true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 13:46:25 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.75 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.20/0.75 % BCE start: 12
% 0.20/0.75 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.20/0.75 % PE start: 12
% 0.20/0.75 logic: eq
% 0.20/0.75 % PE eliminated: 1
% 0.20/0.75 % done 20 iterations in 0.012s
% 0.20/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.20/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 % Terminating...
% 1.38/0.86 % Runner terminated.
% 1.55/0.87 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------