TSTP Solution File: SET928+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:13:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.79s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   4 unt;   5 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (   8 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(X,Y),Z)
    | ~ in(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( in(X,Y)
    | in(Z,Y)
    | disjoint(unordered_pair(X,Z),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(6,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') != unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV5')
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV4','SKOLEMAAAV5') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(7,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') = unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV5') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(8,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') = unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV4','SKOLEMAAAV5') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ disjoint(X,Y)
    | set_difference(X,Y) = X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t83_xboole_1) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( disjoint(X,Y)
    | set_difference(X,Y) != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t83_xboole_1) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    ( in(X,'SKOLEMAAAV5')
    | disjoint(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3',X),'SKOLEMAAAV5')
    | set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') = unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,5]) ).

cnf(253,plain,
    ( disjoint(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5')
    | set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') = unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,16]) ).

cnf(263,plain,
    set_difference(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5') = unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,253]) ).

cnf(264,plain,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV5')
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV4','SKOLEMAAAV5') ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,263,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(295,plain,
    disjoint(unordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV5'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,263]) ).

cnf(296,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV3','SKOLEMAAAV5'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,295,264]) ).

cnf(297,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,295]),296]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 18:55:42 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.45  * 
% 0.18/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  "."
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T18:55:43
% 0.18/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n028.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T18:55:43
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.18/0.47  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (NOT (|disjoint| ?X ?Y)) (|disjoint| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.18/0.47  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Declaring disjoint to be commutative.
% 0.61/0.79  
% 0.61/0.79  #||
% 0.61/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.79  ||#
% 0.61/0.79  
% 0.61/0.79  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.61/0.79  ;      1155 formulas have been input or derived (from 54 formulas).
% 0.61/0.79  ;       297 (26%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.61/0.79  ;           65 (22%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.61/0.79  ;          232 (78%) are still being kept.
% 0.61/0.79  ; 
% 0.61/0.79  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.002   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (9 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.033  10%   Process new row              (1,058 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.027   8%   Resolution                   (106 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.002   1%   Paramodulation               (53 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.001   0%   Factoring                    (31 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.039  12%   Condensing                   (828 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.035  11%   Forward subsumption          (828 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.013   4%   Backward subsumption         (270 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.102  31%   Clause clause subsumption    (7,440 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.034  10%   Forward simplification       (1,039 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.005   2%   Backward simplification      (297 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.004   1%   Ordering                     (1,728 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.031   9%   Other
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.329        Total
% 0.61/0.79  ;     0.330        Real time
% 0.61/0.79  ; 
% 0.61/0.79  ; Term-hash-array has 426 terms in all.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 211 entries (224 at peak, 270 added, 59 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 489 nodes (674 at peak, 964 added, 475 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ;  Retrieved 13,363 possibly forward subsuming rows in 828 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ;  Retrieved 1,609 possibly backward subsumed rows in 270 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Path-index has 342 entries (369 at peak, 448 added, 106 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Path-index has 114 nodes (123 at peak, 143 added, 29 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Trie-index has 342 entries (369 at peak, 448 added, 106 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Trie-index has 507 nodes (572 at peak, 715 added, 208 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79  ; Retrieved 2,810 generalization terms in 2,625 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Retrieved 74 instance terms in 26 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; Retrieved 2,984 unifiable terms in 521 calls.
% 0.61/0.79  ; 
% 0.61/0.79  ; The agenda of rows to process has 21 entries:
% 0.61/0.79  ;     1 with value 9               4 with value 16               4 with value 19
% 0.61/0.79  ;     6 with value 12              1 with value 17               4 with value 23
% 0.61/0.79  ;     1 with value 15
% 0.61/0.79  ; The agenda of rows to give has 192 entries:
% 0.61/0.79  ;     1 with value (4 9)          14 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 42)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     1 with value (4 16)          9 with value (4 30)           8 with value (4 43)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     1 with value (4 17)         12 with value (4 31)           3 with value (4 44)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     2 with value (4 18)          5 with value (4 32)           6 with value (4 45)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     2 with value (4 20)         12 with value (4 33)           6 with value (4 47)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     1 with value (4 21)          8 with value (4 34)           3 with value (4 48)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     4 with value (4 22)          7 with value (4 35)           2 with value (4 49)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     2 with value (4 23)          6 with value (4 36)           2 with value (4 50)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     5 with value (4 24)          8 with value (4 37)           3 with value (4 51)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     7 with value (4 25)          9 with value (4 38)           2 with value (4 52)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     5 with value (4 26)          5 with value (4 39)           1 with value (4 54)
% 0.61/0.79  ;    11 with value (4 27)          5 with value (4 40)           2 with value (4 55)
% 0.61/0.79  ;     5 with value (4 28)          5 with value (4 41)
% 0.61/0.79  Evaluation took:
% 0.61/0.79    0.331 seconds of real time
% 0.61/0.79    0.295176 seconds of user run time
% 0.61/0.79    0.03615 seconds of system run time
% 0.61/0.79    [Run times include 0.006 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.61/0.79    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.61/0.79    0 page faults and
% 0.61/0.79    24,894,256 bytes consed.
% 0.61/0.79  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.79  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T18:55:43
% 0.61/0.79  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.79  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------