TSTP Solution File: SET928+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.72s 1.94s
% Output   : Refutation 1.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   34 (  10 unt;   9 nHn;  27 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (  12 equ;  30 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ in(A,B)
    | ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    | ~ in(A,C) ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) = unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4)
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3) ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) = unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) != unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4)
    | in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3)
    | in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ disjoint(A,B)
    | set_difference(A,B) = A ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( disjoint(A,B)
    | set_difference(A,B) != A ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    ~ in(A,A),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[1]),
    [iquote('factor,1.1.2')] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( in(A,B)
    | in(C,B)
    | disjoint(unordered_pair(A,C),B) ),
    file('SET928+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    ( in(A,B)
    | disjoint(unordered_pair(A,A),B) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[14]),
    [iquote('factor,14.1.2')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4) = set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,6])]),
    [iquote('para_from,12.1.1,6.1.1.1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(18,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4) = set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,5])]),
    [iquote('para_from,12.1.1,5.1.1.1,flip.1')] ).

cnf(19,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(A,B),C)
    | ~ in(B,C) ),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,4]),
    [iquote('para_from,12.1.1,4.1.1')] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c4),dollar_c3)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) = unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[15,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,15,6')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    ( in(A,B)
    | disjoint(unordered_pair(B,A),B) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[14,10]),
    [iquote('hyper,14,10')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( in(A,dollar_c3)
    | disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,A),dollar_c3)
    | set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) = unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[14,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,14,5')] ).

cnf(79,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3),A)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,A)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[17,19]),
    [iquote('para_from,17.1.1,19.1.1')] ).

cnf(81,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3),dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[79]),
    [iquote('factor,79.2.3')] ).

cnf(118,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3),A)
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,A)
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,4]),
    [iquote('para_from,18.1.1,4.1.1')] ).

cnf(119,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c5),dollar_c3),dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[118]),
    [iquote('factor,118.2.3')] ).

cnf(154,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3),dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[81,12]),
    [iquote('para_into,81.1.1.1,12.1.1')] ).

cnf(172,plain,
    ( disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3)
    | disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) ),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[21,9]),11]),
    [iquote('para_from,21.2.1,9.2.1,unit_del,11')] ).

cnf(271,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3),dollar_c3)
    | ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[119,12]),
    [iquote('para_into,119.1.1.1,12.1.1')] ).

cnf(334,plain,
    disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c4),dollar_c3),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[172,19,15])]),
    [iquote('hyper,172,19,15,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(351,plain,
    ( disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3)
    | in(A,dollar_c3)
    | disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,A),dollar_c3) ),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(para_from,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,9]),11]),
    [iquote('para_from,29.3.1,9.2.1,unit_del,11')] ).

cnf(352,plain,
    ( disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3)
    | in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[351]),
    [iquote('factor,351.1.3')] ).

cnf(354,plain,
    disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c3,dollar_c4),dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[334,19,27]),
    [iquote('hyper,334,19,27')] ).

cnf(512,plain,
    disjoint(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[352,19,354]),
    [iquote('hyper,352,19,354')] ).

cnf(514,plain,
    set_difference(unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),dollar_c3) = unordered_pair(dollar_c5,dollar_c4),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[512,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,512,8')] ).

cnf(524,plain,
    ~ in(dollar_c5,dollar_c3),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[271]),514]),512]),
    [iquote('back_demod,271,demod,514,unit_del,512')] ).

cnf(525,plain,
    ~ in(dollar_c4,dollar_c3),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[154]),514]),512]),
    [iquote('back_demod,154,demod,514,unit_del,512')] ).

cnf(526,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[7]),514]),11,524,525]),
    [iquote('back_demod,7,demod,514,unit_del,11,524,525')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 10:44:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.72/1.94  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.72/1.94  The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 1.72/1.94  Wed Jul 27 10:44:20 2022
% 1.72/1.94  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 26629.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.72/1.94  set(auto).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.72/1.94  clear(print_given).
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  formula_list(usable).
% 1.72/1.94  all A (A=A).
% 1.72/1.94  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.72/1.94  all A B (unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 1.72/1.94  exists A empty(A).
% 1.72/1.94  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.72/1.94  all A B (disjoint(A,B)->disjoint(B,A)).
% 1.72/1.94  all A B C (-(disjoint(unordered_pair(A,B),C)&in(A,C))).
% 1.72/1.94  all A B C (-(-in(A,B)& -in(C,B)& -disjoint(unordered_pair(A,C),B))).
% 1.72/1.94  -(all A B C (set_difference(unordered_pair(A,B),C)=unordered_pair(A,B)<-> -in(A,C)& -in(B,C))).
% 1.72/1.94  all A B (disjoint(A,B)<->set_difference(A,B)=A).
% 1.72/1.94  end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  list(usable).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] empty($c1).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] -disjoint(A,B)|disjoint(B,A).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] -disjoint(unordered_pair(A,B),C)| -in(A,C).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] in(A,B)|in(C,B)|disjoint(unordered_pair(A,C),B).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=unordered_pair($c5,$c4)| -in($c5,$c3).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=unordered_pair($c5,$c4)| -in($c4,$c3).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)!=unordered_pair($c5,$c4)|in($c5,$c3)|in($c4,$c3).
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] -disjoint(A,B)|set_difference(A,B)=A.
% 1.72/1.94  0 [] disjoint(A,B)|set_difference(A,B)!=A.
% 1.72/1.94  end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.72/1.94  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.72/1.94  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.72/1.94  clauses in usable.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.72/1.94     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ------------> process usable:
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 2 [] -empty($c2).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 3 [] -disjoint(A,B)|disjoint(B,A).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 4 [] -disjoint(unordered_pair(A,B),C)| -in(A,C).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 5 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=unordered_pair($c5,$c4)| -in($c5,$c3).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 6 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)=unordered_pair($c5,$c4)| -in($c4,$c3).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 7 [] set_difference(unordered_pair($c5,$c4),$c3)!=unordered_pair($c5,$c4)|in($c5,$c3)|in($c4,$c3).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] -disjoint(A,B)|set_difference(A,B)=A.
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 9 [] disjoint(A,B)|set_difference(A,B)!=A.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ------------> process sos:
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 11 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 12 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 13 [] empty($c1).
% 1.72/1.94  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 14 [] in(A,B)|in(C,B)|disjoint(unordered_pair(A,C),B).
% 1.72/1.94    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.72/1.94    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.05 sec ----> 526 [back_demod,7,demod,514,unit_del,11,524,525] $F.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Length of proof is 23.  Level of proof is 8.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.72/1.94  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.72/1.94  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.72/1.94  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ============ end of search ============
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.72/1.94  clauses given                 54
% 1.72/1.94  clauses generated           1638
% 1.72/1.94  clauses kept                 516
% 1.72/1.94  clauses forward subsumed    1164
% 1.72/1.94  clauses back subsumed         27
% 1.72/1.94  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.72/1.94  user CPU time          0.05          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.94  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.94  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.72/1.94  
% 1.72/1.94  Process 26629 finished Wed Jul 27 10:44:22 2022
% 1.72/1.94  Otter interrupted
% 1.72/1.94  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------