TSTP Solution File: SET928+1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:54:52 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.08s 1.84s
% Output : Refutation 3.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 7 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 43 ( 9 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 155 ( 24 ~; 0 |; 12 &; 108 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 9 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 0 ^; 37 !; 4 ?; 41 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(set_difference_type,type,
set_difference: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_type,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(disjoint_type,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(5,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(25,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(20,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
<=> ( ( set_difference @ A @ B )
= A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t83_xboole_1) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( ( set_difference @ A @ B )
= A ) )
& ( ( ( set_difference @ A @ B )
= A )
=> ( disjoint @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
& ( in @ A @ C ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(32,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
& ( in @ A @ C ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( in @ A @ B )
& ~ ( in @ C @ B )
& ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
~ ( ~ ( in @ A @ B )
& ~ ( in @ C @ B )
& ~ ( disjoint @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( ~ ( in @ A @ C )
& ~ ( in @ B @ C ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t72_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( ~ ( in @ A @ C )
& ~ ( in @ B @ C ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(11,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) )
=> ( ~ ( in @ A @ C )
& ~ ( in @ B @ C ) ) )
& ( ( ~ ( in @ A @ C )
& ~ ( in @ B @ C ) )
=> ( ( set_difference @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).
thf(30,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
=> ( disjoint @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(22,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(27,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(45,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,20,38,32,35,11,30,22,27]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SET928+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.15 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu May 18 19:11:40 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.86/0.84 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.19/0.96 % [INFO] Parsing done (117ms).
% 1.19/0.97 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.73/1.28 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.73/1.29 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.73/1.29 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.93/1.35 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 8 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.93/1.38 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 8 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.04/1.40 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.04/1.41 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.04/1.41 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.08/1.83 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.08/1.83 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.08/1.83 % Time passed: 1318ms (effective reasoning time: 862ms)
% 3.08/1.83 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.08/1.84 % Axioms used in derivation (8): t57_zfmisc_1, t55_zfmisc_1, t83_xboole_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, rc1_xboole_0, symmetry_r1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 3.08/1.84 % No. of inferences in proof: 20
% 3.08/1.84 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1318 ms resp. 862 ms w/o parsing
% 3.18/1.90 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.18/1.90 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------