TSTP Solution File: SET921+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SET921+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 01:03:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SET921+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 21:02:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.38 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.38 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.19/0.38 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 0.19/0.38 #
% 0.19/0.38 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.38 # Number of axioms: 16 Number of unprocessed: 16
% 0.19/0.38 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.38 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.38 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.38 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.38 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.38 # 16 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.38 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.38 # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.38 # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.38 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.38 # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.38 # 13 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.38 # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.38 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.19/0.38 # Returning from population with 11 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.38 # We now have 11 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.39 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.39 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (empty(esk3_0))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (in(X1,singleton(X1)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (~empty(esk4_0))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (esk7_0=esk5_0|~in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))|~in(esk5_0,esk6_0))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))|esk7_0!=esk5_0)).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))|in(esk5_0,esk6_0))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))|~in(X1,X3))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (X1=X2|~in(X1,singleton(X2)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=singleton(X2)|esk1_2(X2,X1)!=X2|~in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))|in(X1,X3)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (esk1_2(X1,X2)=X1|X2=singleton(X1)|in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=set_difference(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=set_difference(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1))).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (X1=set_difference(X2,X3)|in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)|~in(esk2_3(X2,X3,X1),X2))).
% 0.19/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.39 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39 # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))|in(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (in(esk5_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_1])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~in(esk6_0,esk5_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_23, ...])).
% 0.19/0.39 cnf(i_0_105, plain, (~in(esk6_0,set_difference(esk5_0,X6))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_105, ...])).
% 0.19/0.39 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.39 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.39 # Child (23214) has found a proof.
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.39 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------