TSTP Solution File: SET921+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET921+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:16 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.21s 2.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (   5 unt;   6 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (  22 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_difference(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X2 != set_difference(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk7_0 = esk5_0
    | ~ in(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X3
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))
    | esk7_0 != esk5_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z973pfvo/lgb.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != set_difference(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | X2 != set_difference(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk7_0 = esk5_0
    | ~ in(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | ~ in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk7_0 = esk5_0
    | ~ in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,X1))
    | in(esk5_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X3
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))
    | esk7_0 != esk5_0 ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    esk7_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk5_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : SET921+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 21:03:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.21/2.23  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.21/2.23  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.21/2.23  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.21/2.23  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C18_F1_PI_AE_R8_CS_SP_S2S
% 7.21/2.23  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.21/2.23  #
% 7.21/2.23  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 7.21/2.23  
% 7.21/2.23  # Proof found!
% 7.21/2.23  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.21/2.23  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.21/2.23  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.21/2.23  
% 7.21/2.23  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.21/2.23  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 7.21/2.23  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.21/2.23  # Total time               : 0.033 s
% 7.21/2.23  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.21/2.23  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------