TSTP Solution File: SET921+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SET921+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:36:16 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (   5 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  34 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  45   ~;  48   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   6   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   5 sgn;  31   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    set_difference: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk2_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk6_0: $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    esk7_0: $i ).

fof(d4_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_xboole_0) ).

fof(t64_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X3)))
    <=> ( in(X1,X2)
        & X1 != X3 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t64_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21] :
      ( ( in(X17,X14)
        | ~ in(X17,X16)
        | X16 != set_difference(X14,X15) )
      & ( ~ in(X17,X15)
        | ~ in(X17,X16)
        | X16 != set_difference(X14,X15) )
      & ( ~ in(X18,X14)
        | in(X18,X15)
        | in(X18,X16)
        | X16 != set_difference(X14,X15) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X19,X20,X21),X21)
        | ~ in(esk2_3(X19,X20,X21),X19)
        | in(esk2_3(X19,X20,X21),X20)
        | X21 = set_difference(X19,X20) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X19,X20,X21),X19)
        | in(esk2_3(X19,X20,X21),X21)
        | X21 = set_difference(X19,X20) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X19,X20,X21),X20)
        | in(esk2_3(X19,X20,X21),X21)
        | X21 = set_difference(X19,X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X3)))
      <=> ( in(X1,X2)
          & X1 != X3 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t64_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X3 != set_difference(X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))
      | ~ in(esk5_0,esk6_0)
      | esk5_0 = esk7_0 )
    & ( in(esk5_0,esk6_0)
      | in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) )
    & ( esk5_0 != esk7_0
      | in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,esk6_0)
    | in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X4 != set_difference(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( ~ in(X9,X8)
        | X9 = X7
        | X8 != singleton(X7) )
      & ( X10 != X7
        | in(X10,X8)
        | X8 != singleton(X7) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X11,X12),X12)
        | esk1_2(X11,X12) != X11
        | X12 = singleton(X11) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X11,X12),X12)
        | esk1_2(X11,X12) = X11
        | X12 = singleton(X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk5_0 = esk7_0
    | ~ in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))
    | ~ in(esk5_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | X3 != set_difference(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk7_0 = esk5_0
    | ~ in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,X1))
    | in(esk5_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3))
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,set_difference(esk6_0,singleton(esk7_0)))
    | esk5_0 != esk7_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    esk7_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24])]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SET921+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 13:22:11 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.58  % Total time : 0.007000 s
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.58  % Total time : 0.010000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------