TSTP Solution File: SET920+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET920+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.19s 2.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 11 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eeltfoiw/lgb.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_20,negated_conjecture,
set_intersection2(unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk7_0) = unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eeltfoiw/lgb.p',i_0_20) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eeltfoiw/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eeltfoiw/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk5_0,esk7_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-eeltfoiw/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X3 != set_intersection2(X2,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
set_intersection2(unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk7_0) = unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0),
i_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
set_intersection2(esk7_0,unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)) = unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,esk7_0)
| ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk5_0,esk7_0),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET920+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 14:53:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.19/2.40 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.19/2.40 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.19/2.40 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.19/2.40 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.19/2.40 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.19/2.40 #
% 7.19/2.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 7.19/2.40 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.19/2.40
% 7.19/2.40 # Proof found!
% 7.19/2.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.19/2.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.19/2.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.19/2.40
% 7.19/2.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.19/2.40 # User time : 0.014 s
% 7.19/2.40 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.19/2.40 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 7.19/2.40 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.19/2.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------