TSTP Solution File: SET919+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET919+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:21:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 56.73s 56.95s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SET919+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 18:44:36 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.34 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.10/0.34 The process was started by sandbox2 on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.10/0.34 Sat Jul 9 18:44:36 2022
% 0.10/0.34 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 19969.
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.10/0.34 set(auto).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.10/0.34 clear(print_given).
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 formula_list(usable).
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.10/0.34 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.10/0.34 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.10/0.34 clauses in usable.
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.10/0.34 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 ------------> process usable:
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 ------------> process sos:
% 0.10/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,25,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.10/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [copy,26,flip.1] {-} set_intersection2(A,B)=set_intersection2(B,A).
% 0.10/0.34 Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [copy,35,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.10/0.34
% 0.10/0.34 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.17/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.17/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.17/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.17/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 36
% 0.17/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 55
% 0.17/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.17/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.17/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.17/0.39 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.17/0.39 distinct function count: 6
% 0.17/0.39 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39
% 0.17/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.62/1.82
% 1.62/1.82
% 1.62/1.82 Changing weight limit from 60 to 37.
% 1.62/1.82
% 1.62/1.82 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 55 givens.
% 1.62/1.82
% 2.53/2.80
% 2.53/2.80
% 2.53/2.80 Changing weight limit from 37 to 30.
% 2.53/2.80
% 2.53/2.80 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 60 givens.
% 2.53/2.80
% 3.03/3.29
% 3.03/3.29
% 3.03/3.29 Changing weight limit from 30 to 27.
% 3.03/3.29
% 3.03/3.29 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 65 givens.
% 3.03/3.29
% 3.62/3.81
% 3.62/3.81
% 3.62/3.81 Changing weight limit from 27 to 25.
% 3.62/3.81
% 3.62/3.81 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 70 givens.
% 3.62/3.81
% 4.01/4.23
% 4.01/4.23
% 4.01/4.23 Changing weight limit from 25 to 23.
% 4.01/4.23
% 4.01/4.23 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 75 givens.
% 4.01/4.23
% 5.02/5.25
% 5.02/5.25
% 5.02/5.25 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 5.02/5.25
% 5.02/5.25 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 85 givens.
% 5.02/5.25
% 5.71/5.91
% 5.71/5.91
% 5.71/5.91 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 5.71/5.91
% 5.71/5.91 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 90 givens.
% 5.71/5.91
% 6.01/6.26
% 6.01/6.26
% 6.01/6.26 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 6.01/6.26
% 6.01/6.26 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 95 givens.
% 6.01/6.26
% 6.73/6.92
% 6.73/6.92
% 6.73/6.92 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 6.73/6.92
% 6.73/6.92 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 105 givens.
% 6.73/6.92
% 7.22/7.46
% 7.22/7.46
% 7.22/7.46 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 7.22/7.46
% 7.22/7.46 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 115 givens.
% 7.22/7.46
% 9.09/9.31
% 9.09/9.31
% 9.09/9.31 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 9.09/9.31
% 9.09/9.31 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 165 givens.
% 9.09/9.31
% 13.59/13.87
% 13.59/13.87
% 13.59/13.87 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 13.59/13.87
% 13.59/13.87 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 295 givens.
% 13.59/13.87
% 56.73/56.95
% 56.73/56.95 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 56.73/56.95
% 56.73/56.95 in($c5,set_intersection2(set_intersection2(set_intersection2($c4,set_intersection2(singleton($c5),$c4)),set_intersection2(singleton($c5),$c4)),$c4)).
% 56.73/56.95
% 56.73/56.95 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 56.73/56.95 281 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 8973.3 K.
% 56.73/56.95 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 56.73/56.95 sym_ent ( 304) 127 0 127 0 37.7 K
% 56.73/56.95 term ( 32) 86629459 86609119 20340 4359 771.8 K
% 56.73/56.95 rel ( 40) 81906554 81866705 39849 5088 1755.4 K
% 56.73/56.95 term_ptr ( 16) 1103864 908103 195761 3730 3117.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 fpa_head ( 24) 14172 6870 7302 119 173.9 K
% 56.73/56.95 fpa_tree ( 56) 917538 917538 0 1831 100.1 K
% 56.73/56.95 context (1288) 5125506 5125506 0 6 7.5 K
% 56.73/56.95 trail ( 24) 6767496 6767496 0 13 0.3 K
% 56.73/56.95 imd_tree ( 32) 11 0 11 0 0.3 K
% 56.73/56.95 imd_pos (4024) 19574410 19574410 0 3 11.8 K
% 56.73/56.95 is_tree ( 24) 62181 43696 18485 725 450.2 K
% 56.73/56.95 is_pos (2424) 83857850 83857850 0 13 30.8 K
% 56.73/56.95 fsub_pos ( 16) 3490538 3490538 0 1 0.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 literal ( 32) 4828604 4815565 13039 3739 524.3 K
% 56.73/56.95 clause ( 88) 1888173 1880312 7861 1 675.6 K
% 56.73/56.95 list ( 272) 21 14 7 2 2.4 K
% 56.73/56.95 clash_nd ( 80) 32540 32540 0 3 0.2 K
% 56.73/56.95 clause_ptr ( 16) 26920 18467 8453 213 135.4 K
% 56.73/56.95 int_ptr ( 16) 11142834 11085244 57590 9 900.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 56.73/56.95 formula( 40) 192 192 0 74 2.9 K
% 56.73/56.95 formula_ptr( 16) 11 11 0 11 0.2 K
% 56.73/56.95 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 56.73/56.95
% 56.73/56.95 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 56.73/56.95 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 print_cl time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 conflict time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 new demod time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 post_process time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 back demod time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 back subsume 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 factor time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 FINDER time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95 unindex time 0.00
% 56.73/56.95
% 56.73/56.95 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 56.73/56.95 1:0 2:4 3:0 4:3 5:2 6:0 7:0 8:3 9:3 10:0
% 56.73/56.95 11:0 12:0 13:3 14:23 15:17 16:0 17:6 18:81 19:3 20:0
% 56.73/56.95 21:11 22:11 23:0 24:2 25:246 26:40 27:17 28:25 29:41 30:48
% 56.73/56.95 31:0 32:0 33:95 34:6040 35:12779 36:31 37:271 38:267 39:18 40:0
% 56.73/56.95 41:20 42:20 43:9 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:1
% 56.73/56.95 51:0 52:0 53:5 54:7 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 56.73/56.95 61:12 62:0 63:0 64:1 65:1 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 56.73/56.95 71:0 72:11 73:1 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:9
% 56.73/56.95 81:0 82:0 83:1 84:1 85:1 86:1 87:3288 88:172 89:18965 90:74
% 56.73/56.95 91:2951 92:2842 93:9 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 56.73/56.95 All others: 59043.
% 56.73/56.95
% 56.73/56.95 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 56.73/56.95
% 56.73/56.95 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------