TSTP Solution File: SET916+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET916+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:21:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 26.71s 26.96s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SET916+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 08:31:48 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.39 Mon Jul 11 08:31:48 2022
% 0.14/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 2418.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [copy,24,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [copy,25,flip.1] {-} set_intersection2(A,B)=set_intersection2(B,A).
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [copy,33,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.21/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 35
% 0.21/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 57
% 0.21/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.21/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.21/0.45 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.21/0.45 distinct function count: 5
% 0.21/0.45 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45
% 0.21/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.32/2.60
% 2.32/2.60
% 2.32/2.60 Changing weight limit from 60 to 40.
% 2.32/2.60
% 2.32/2.60 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 70 givens.
% 2.32/2.60
% 3.19/3.41
% 3.19/3.41
% 3.19/3.41 Changing weight limit from 40 to 33.
% 3.19/3.41
% 3.19/3.41 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 75 givens.
% 3.19/3.41
% 3.48/3.70
% 3.48/3.70
% 3.48/3.70 Changing weight limit from 33 to 31.
% 3.48/3.70
% 3.48/3.70 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 80 givens.
% 3.48/3.70
% 3.85/4.07
% 3.85/4.07
% 3.85/4.07 Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 3.85/4.07
% 3.85/4.07 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 85 givens.
% 3.85/4.07
% 4.10/4.32
% 4.10/4.32
% 4.10/4.32 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 4.10/4.32
% 4.10/4.32 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 90 givens.
% 4.10/4.32
% 4.29/4.57
% 4.29/4.57
% 4.29/4.57 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 4.29/4.57
% 4.29/4.57 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 95 givens.
% 4.29/4.57
% 4.54/4.74
% 4.54/4.74
% 4.54/4.74 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 4.54/4.74
% 4.54/4.74 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 100 givens.
% 4.54/4.74
% 5.29/5.48
% 5.29/5.48
% 5.29/5.48 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 5.29/5.48
% 5.29/5.48 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 115 givens.
% 5.29/5.48
% 6.04/6.27
% 6.04/6.27
% 6.04/6.27 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 6.04/6.27
% 6.04/6.27 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 140 givens.
% 6.04/6.27
% 6.69/6.91
% 6.69/6.91
% 6.69/6.91 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 6.69/6.91
% 6.69/6.91 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 145 givens.
% 6.69/6.91
% 7.76/7.95
% 7.76/7.95
% 7.76/7.95 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 7.76/7.95
% 7.76/7.95 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 150 givens.
% 7.76/7.95
% 8.28/8.49
% 8.28/8.49
% 8.28/8.49 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 8.28/8.49
% 8.28/8.49 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 155 givens.
% 8.28/8.49
% 8.80/9.03
% 8.80/9.03
% 8.80/9.03 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 8.80/9.03
% 8.80/9.03 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 175 givens.
% 8.80/9.03
% 10.24/10.48
% 10.24/10.48
% 10.24/10.48 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 10.24/10.48
% 10.24/10.48 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 240 givens.
% 10.24/10.48
% 14.67/14.88
% 14.67/14.88
% 14.67/14.88 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 14.67/14.88
% 14.67/14.88 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 14.67/14.88
% 14.67/14.88
% 14.67/14.88 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 330 givens.
% 14.67/14.88
% 26.71/26.96 disjoint(A,B).
% 26.71/26.96
% 26.71/26.96 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 26.71/26.96 321 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 10250.7 K.
% 26.71/26.96 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 26.71/26.96 sym_ent ( 304) 127 0 127 0 37.7 K
% 26.71/26.96 term ( 32) 46613346 46595443 17903 15788 1052.8 K
% 26.71/26.96 rel ( 40) 43663824 43630462 33362 27833 2390.4 K
% 26.71/26.96 term_ptr ( 16) 1137115 1015606 121509 102689 3503.1 K
% 26.71/26.96 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 fpa_head ( 24) 12652 8034 4618 387 117.3 K
% 26.71/26.96 fpa_tree ( 56) 2734838 2734838 0 535 29.3 K
% 26.71/26.96 context (1288) 3013190 3013190 0 7 8.8 K
% 26.71/26.96 trail ( 24) 19037714 19037714 0 15 0.4 K
% 26.71/26.96 imd_tree ( 32) 364 0 364 0 11.4 K
% 26.71/26.96 imd_pos (4024) 8897577 8897577 0 7 27.5 K
% 26.71/26.96 is_tree ( 24) 47047 36761 10286 7762 423.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 is_pos (2424) 42510277 42510277 0 16 37.9 K
% 26.71/26.96 fsub_pos ( 16) 2037174 2037174 0 1 0.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 literal ( 32) 2746292 2732073 14219 9340 736.2 K
% 26.71/26.96 clause ( 88) 1069789 1063617 6172 899 607.7 K
% 26.71/26.96 list ( 272) 22 15 7 2 2.4 K
% 26.71/26.96 clash_nd ( 80) 6944 6944 0 4 0.3 K
% 26.71/26.96 clause_ptr ( 16) 26086 19928 6158 887 110.1 K
% 26.71/26.96 int_ptr ( 16) 6180266 6132121 48145 9201 896.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 26.71/26.96 formula( 40) 178 178 0 94 3.7 K
% 26.71/26.96 formula_ptr( 16) 12 12 0 12 0.2 K
% 26.71/26.96 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 26.71/26.96
% 26.71/26.96 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
% 26.71/26.96 0.00
% 26.71/26.96 FINDER time 0.00
% 26.71/26.96 unindex time 0.00
% 26.71/26.96
% 26.71/26.96 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 26.71/26.96 1:52 2:6 3:0 4:0 5:3 6:3 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:6
% 26.71/26.96 11:39 12:0 13:2 14:432 15:416 16:11 17:690 18:9 19:0 20:13
% 26.71/26.96 21:13 22:0 23:2 24:1522 25:162 26:29 27:61 28:72 29:0 30:0
% 26.71/26.96 31:391 32:35 33:25159 34:40 35:282 36:269 37:22 38:0 39:73 40:91
% 26.71/26.96 41:18 42:178 43:30 44:30 45:30 46:28 47:0 48:0 49:92 50:18
% 26.71/26.96 51:10 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:16 56:18 57:0 58:0 59:15 60:182
% 26.71/26.96 61:194 62:13 63:2 64:2 65:2 66:10 67:7 68:11 69:21 70:1
% 26.71/26.96 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:1 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 26.71/26.96 81:0 82:1 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:2 89:0 90:0
% 26.71/26.96 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:1 97:0 98:0 99:1
% 26.71/26.96 All others: 159556.
% 26.71/26.96
% 26.71/26.96 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 26.71/26.96
% 26.71/26.96 ********** is_delete, can't find term.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------