TSTP Solution File: SET916+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SET916+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 03:51:26 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 3.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  253 (  82 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  335 ( 130   ~; 127   |;  73   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  136 (   4 sgn  81   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X2)
     => disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpNPJwNR/sel_SET916+1.p_1',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

fof(4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2))
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpNPJwNR/sel_SET916+1.p_1',t4_xboole_0) ).

fof(6,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( ~ in(X1,X2)
        & ~ in(X3,X2)
        & ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpNPJwNR/sel_SET916+1.p_1',t57_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(9,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( in(X4,X1)
            & in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpNPJwNR/sel_SET916+1.p_1',d3_xboole_0) ).

fof(11,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( X4 = X1
            | X4 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpNPJwNR/sel_SET916+1.p_1',d2_tarski) ).

fof(12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ~ ( ~ in(X1,X2)
          & ~ in(X3,X2)
          & ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[6]) ).

fof(13,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
          & ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) )
      & ~ ( ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2))
          & disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[4,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ~ ( ~ in(X1,X2)
          & ~ in(X3,X2)
          & ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[12,theory(equality)]) ).

fof(21,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X1,X2)
      | disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(22,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ disjoint(X3,X4)
      | disjoint(X4,X3) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    ( disjoint(X1,X2)
    | ~ disjoint(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

fof(24,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( disjoint(X1,X2)
        | ? [X3] : in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2)) )
      & ( ! [X3] : ~ in(X3,set_intersection2(X1,X2))
        | ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

fof(25,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( disjoint(X4,X5)
        | ? [X6] : in(X6,set_intersection2(X4,X5)) )
      & ( ! [X7] : ~ in(X7,set_intersection2(X4,X5))
        | ~ disjoint(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

fof(26,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( disjoint(X4,X5)
        | in(esk1_2(X4,X5),set_intersection2(X4,X5)) )
      & ( ! [X7] : ~ in(X7,set_intersection2(X4,X5))
        | ~ disjoint(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[25]) ).

fof(27,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X7] :
      ( ( ~ in(X7,set_intersection2(X4,X5))
        | ~ disjoint(X4,X5) )
      & ( disjoint(X4,X5)
        | in(esk1_2(X4,X5),set_intersection2(X4,X5)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

cnf(28,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),set_intersection2(X1,X2))
    | disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

fof(33,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ in(X1,X2)
      & ~ in(X3,X2)
      & ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

fof(34,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ in(X4,X5)
      & ~ in(X6,X5)
      & ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(X4,X6),X5) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

fof(35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & ~ in(esk5_0,esk4_0)
    & ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk5_0),esk4_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[34]) ).

cnf(36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ disjoint(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk5_0),esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

cnf(37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk5_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

cnf(38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

fof(44,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( X3 != set_intersection2(X1,X2)
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X3)
              | ( in(X4,X1)
                & in(X4,X2) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X4,X1)
              | ~ in(X4,X2)
              | in(X4,X3) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X3)
              | ~ in(X4,X1)
              | ~ in(X4,X2) )
            & ( in(X4,X3)
              | ( in(X4,X1)
                & in(X4,X2) ) ) )
        | X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

fof(45,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6)
        | ! [X8] :
            ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
              | ( in(X8,X5)
                & in(X8,X6) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X8,X5)
              | ~ in(X8,X6)
              | in(X8,X7) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X9] :
            ( ( ~ in(X9,X7)
              | ~ in(X9,X5)
              | ~ in(X9,X6) )
            & ( in(X9,X7)
              | ( in(X9,X5)
                & in(X9,X6) ) ) )
        | X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

fof(46,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6)
        | ! [X8] :
            ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
              | ( in(X8,X5)
                & in(X8,X6) ) )
            & ( ~ in(X8,X5)
              | ~ in(X8,X6)
              | in(X8,X7) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
            | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) )
          & ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
              & in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) ) ) )
        | X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[45]) ).

fof(47,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
            | ( in(X8,X5)
              & in(X8,X6) ) )
          & ( ~ in(X8,X5)
            | ~ in(X8,X6)
            | in(X8,X7) ) )
        | X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
      & ( ( ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
            | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) )
          & ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
              & in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) ) ) )
        | X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[46]) ).

fof(48,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( in(X8,X5)
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
      & ( in(X8,X6)
        | ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X8,X5)
        | ~ in(X8,X6)
        | in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
      & ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) )
      & ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = set_intersection2(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[47]) ).

cnf(53,plain,
    ( in(X4,X3)
    | X1 != set_intersection2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

cnf(54,plain,
    ( in(X4,X2)
    | X1 != set_intersection2(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48]) ).

fof(58,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( X3 != unordered_pair(X1,X2)
        | ! [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X3)
              | X4 = X1
              | X4 = X2 )
            & ( ( X4 != X1
                & X4 != X2 )
              | in(X4,X3) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X4] :
            ( ( ~ in(X4,X3)
              | ( X4 != X1
                & X4 != X2 ) )
            & ( in(X4,X3)
              | X4 = X1
              | X4 = X2 ) )
        | X3 = unordered_pair(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

fof(59,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( X7 != unordered_pair(X5,X6)
        | ! [X8] :
            ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
              | X8 = X5
              | X8 = X6 )
            & ( ( X8 != X5
                & X8 != X6 )
              | in(X8,X7) ) ) )
      & ( ? [X9] :
            ( ( ~ in(X9,X7)
              | ( X9 != X5
                & X9 != X6 ) )
            & ( in(X9,X7)
              | X9 = X5
              | X9 = X6 ) )
        | X7 = unordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[58]) ).

fof(60,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( X7 != unordered_pair(X5,X6)
        | ! [X8] :
            ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
              | X8 = X5
              | X8 = X6 )
            & ( ( X8 != X5
                & X8 != X6 )
              | in(X8,X7) ) ) )
      & ( ( ( ~ in(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | ( esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) != X5
              & esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) != X6 ) )
          & ( in(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) = X5
            | esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) = X6 ) )
        | X7 = unordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[59]) ).

fof(61,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
            | X8 = X5
            | X8 = X6 )
          & ( ( X8 != X5
              & X8 != X6 )
            | in(X8,X7) ) )
        | X7 != unordered_pair(X5,X6) )
      & ( ( ( ~ in(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | ( esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) != X5
              & esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) != X6 ) )
          & ( in(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
            | esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) = X5
            | esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) = X6 ) )
        | X7 = unordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

fof(62,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
        | X8 = X5
        | X8 = X6
        | X7 != unordered_pair(X5,X6) )
      & ( X8 != X5
        | in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != unordered_pair(X5,X6) )
      & ( X8 != X6
        | in(X8,X7)
        | X7 != unordered_pair(X5,X6) )
      & ( esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) != X5
        | ~ in(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = unordered_pair(X5,X6) )
      & ( esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) != X6
        | ~ in(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | X7 = unordered_pair(X5,X6) )
      & ( in(esk8_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
        | esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) = X5
        | esk8_3(X5,X6,X7) = X6
        | X7 = unordered_pair(X5,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[61]) ).

cnf(68,plain,
    ( X4 = X3
    | X4 = X2
    | X1 != unordered_pair(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[62]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[53,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(83,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[54,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(88,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 = X2
    | ~ in(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[68,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(170,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[78,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    ( X1 = esk1_2(X2,unordered_pair(X3,X1))
    | X3 = esk1_2(X2,unordered_pair(X3,X1))
    | disjoint(X2,unordered_pair(X3,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[88,170,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(194,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | disjoint(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[83,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1419,plain,
    ( in(X2,X1)
    | disjoint(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | esk1_2(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) = X3 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[194,189,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(70163,plain,
    ( in(X3,X1)
    | disjoint(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[194,1419,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(70857,plain,
    ( disjoint(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | in(X1,X3)
    | in(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[23,70163,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(71263,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_0,esk4_0)
    | in(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[36,70857,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(71564,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[71263,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(71565,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[71564,38,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(71566,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    71565,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/SInE---0.4/Source/sine.py:10: DeprecationWarning: the sets module is deprecated
%   from sets import Set
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET916+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpNPJwNR/sel_SET916+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SET916+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET916+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET916+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------