TSTP Solution File: SET916+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SET916+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:04:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.59s 0.83s
% Output : Proof 3.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ in(sK5,sK6),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
~ in(sK7,sK6),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ disjoint(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t57_zfmisc_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6))
| disjoint(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
sPE(sK6,sK6),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
sPE(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),unordered_pair(sK5,sK7)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
sPE(set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),set_intersection2(sK6,unordered_pair(sK5,sK7))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),set_intersection2(sK6,unordered_pair(sK5,sK7)))
| ~ in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6))
| in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),sK6) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),set_intersection2(sK6,unordered_pair(sK5,sK7)))
| ~ in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),set_intersection2(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6))
| in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),unordered_pair(sK5,sK7)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),unordered_pair(sK5,sK7))
| ~ in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),unordered_pair(sK5,sK7))
| sPE(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),sK5)
| sPE(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),sK7) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),sK7)
| ~ sPE(sK6,sK6)
| ~ in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),sK6)
| in(sK7,sK6) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),sK5)
| ~ sPE(sK6,sK6)
| ~ in(sK4(unordered_pair(sK5,sK7),sK6),sK6)
| in(sK5,sK6) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET916+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 08:38:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 3.59/0.83 % symbols: 17
% 3.59/0.83 % clauses: 41
% 3.59/0.83 % start clauses: 3
% 3.59/0.83 % iterative deepening steps: 1437
% 3.59/0.83 % maximum path limit: 4
% 3.59/0.83 % literal attempts: 1240461
% 3.59/0.83 % depth failures: 943575
% 3.59/0.83 % regularity failures: 22191
% 3.59/0.83 % tautology failures: 14811
% 3.59/0.83 % reductions: 41223
% 3.59/0.83 % extensions: 1196098
% 3.59/0.83 % SAT variables: 77378
% 3.59/0.83 % SAT clauses: 101720
% 3.59/0.83 % WalkSAT solutions: 101715
% 3.59/0.83 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 3.59/0.83 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.59/0.83 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------