TSTP Solution File: SET914+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET914+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.05s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 38 ( 14 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ahebs5s5/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
disjoint(unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ahebs5s5/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != set_intersection2(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ahebs5s5/lgb.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ahebs5s5/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( X1 != empty_set
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ahebs5s5/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ahebs5s5/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_25,negated_conjecture,
in(esk6_0,esk8_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ahebs5s5/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( set_intersection2(X1,X2) = empty_set
| ~ disjoint(X1,X2) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
disjoint(unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != set_intersection2(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
set_intersection2(unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0),esk8_0) = empty_set,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( X1 != empty_set
| ~ in(X2,X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( in(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
set_intersection2(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0)) = empty_set,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
~ in(X1,empty_set),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(esk6_0,esk7_0))
| ~ in(X1,esk8_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
in(esk6_0,esk8_0),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SET914+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 15:33:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.05/2.42 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.05/2.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.05/2.42 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.05/2.42 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.05/2.42 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.05/2.42 #
% 7.05/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 7.05/2.42 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.05/2.42
% 7.05/2.42 # Proof found!
% 7.05/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.05/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.05/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.05/2.42
% 7.05/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.05/2.42 # User time : 0.014 s
% 7.05/2.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.05/2.42 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 7.05/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.05/2.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------