%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET910+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.54s 2.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    9 (   4 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83iygxcd/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | set_intersection2(X2,singleton(X1)) != singleton(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83iygxcd/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) = singleton(esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83iygxcd/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk4_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | set_intersection2(X2,singleton(X1)) != singleton(X1) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    set_intersection2(esk3_0,singleton(esk4_0)) = singleton(esk4_0),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SET910+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 02:24:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.54/2.29  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.54/2.29  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.54/2.29  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.54/2.29  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.54/2.29  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.54/2.29  #
% 7.54/2.29  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 7.54/2.29  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.54/2.29  
% 7.54/2.29  # Proof found!
% 7.54/2.29  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.54/2.29  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.54/2.29  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.54/2.29  
% 7.54/2.29  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.54/2.29  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 7.54/2.29  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.54/2.29  # Total time               : 0.022 s
% 7.54/2.29  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.54/2.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------