TSTP Solution File: SET909+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SET909+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May  1 03:49:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.78s
% Output   : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  185 (  79 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  241 (  89   ~;  92   |;  51   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   99 (  82   !;  17   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f92,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f81,f67]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] : in(X4,unordered_pair(X4,X1)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X2,X1,X4] :
      ( in(X4,X2)
      | unordered_pair(X4,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( in(X4,X2)
      | X0 != X4
      | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ( ( ( sK3(X0,X1,X2) != X1
              & sK3(X0,X1,X2) != X0 )
            | ~ in(sK3(X0,X1,X2),X2) )
          & ( sK3(X0,X1,X2) = X1
            | sK3(X0,X1,X2) = X0
            | in(sK3(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4] :
            ( ( in(X4,X2)
              | ( X1 != X4
                & X0 != X4 ) )
            & ( X1 = X4
              | X0 = X4
              | ~ in(X4,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3])],[f24,f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( X1 != X3
              & X0 != X3 )
            | ~ in(X3,X2) )
          & ( X1 = X3
            | X0 = X3
            | in(X3,X2) ) )
     => ( ( ( sK3(X0,X1,X2) != X1
            & sK3(X0,X1,X2) != X0 )
          | ~ in(sK3(X0,X1,X2),X2) )
        & ( sK3(X0,X1,X2) = X1
          | sK3(X0,X1,X2) = X0
          | in(sK3(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4] :
            ( ( in(X4,X2)
              | ( X1 != X4
                & X0 != X4 ) )
            & ( X1 = X4
              | X0 = X4
              | ~ in(X4,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 ) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 ) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ( X1 = X3
            | X0 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.59SqoYCiQs/Vampire---4.8_25359',d2_tarski) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ in(X0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f76,f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,empty_set),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( ~ in(X2,X0)
      | empty_set != X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( empty_set = X0
        | in(sK4(X0),X0) )
      & ( ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X0)
        | empty_set != X0 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4])],[f28,f29]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ? [X1] : in(X1,X0)
     => in(sK4(X0),X0) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( empty_set = X0
        | ? [X1] : in(X1,X0) )
      & ( ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X0)
        | empty_set != X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( empty_set = X0
        | ? [X1] : in(X1,X0) )
      & ( ! [X1] : ~ in(X1,X0)
        | empty_set != X0 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( empty_set = X0
    <=> ! [X1] : ~ in(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.59SqoYCiQs/Vampire---4.8_25359',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( in(X0,empty_set)
      | ~ in(X0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f71,f40]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    empty_set = set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    empty_set = set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f16,f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] : empty_set = set_union2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2)
   => empty_set = set_union2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] : empty_set = set_union2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] : empty_set != set_union2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f13,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] : empty_set != set_union2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.59SqoYCiQs/Vampire---4.8_25359',t50_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X4] :
      ( in(X4,set_union2(X0,X1))
      | ~ in(X4,X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( in(X4,X2)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | set_union2(X0,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X2
        | ( ( ( ~ in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X1)
              & ~ in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X0) )
            | ~ in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) )
          & ( in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X1)
            | in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X0)
            | in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4] :
            ( ( in(X4,X2)
              | ( ~ in(X4,X1)
                & ~ in(X4,X0) ) )
            & ( in(X4,X1)
              | in(X4,X0)
              | ~ in(X4,X2) ) )
        | set_union2(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5])],[f33,f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( ~ in(X3,X1)
              & ~ in(X3,X0) )
            | ~ in(X3,X2) )
          & ( in(X3,X1)
            | in(X3,X0)
            | in(X3,X2) ) )
     => ( ( ( ~ in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X1)
            & ~ in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X0) )
          | ~ in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) )
        & ( in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X1)
          | in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X0)
          | in(sK5(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( ~ in(X3,X1)
                & ~ in(X3,X0) )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( in(X3,X1)
              | in(X3,X0)
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4] :
            ( ( in(X4,X2)
              | ( ~ in(X4,X1)
                & ~ in(X4,X0) ) )
            & ( in(X4,X1)
              | in(X4,X0)
              | ~ in(X4,X2) ) )
        | set_union2(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( ~ in(X3,X1)
                & ~ in(X3,X0) )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( in(X3,X1)
              | in(X3,X0)
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( ~ in(X3,X1)
                & ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( in(X3,X1)
              | in(X3,X0)
              | ~ in(X3,X2) ) )
        | set_union2(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( ~ in(X3,X1)
                & ~ in(X3,X0) )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( in(X3,X1)
              | in(X3,X0)
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( ~ in(X3,X1)
                & ~ in(X3,X0) ) )
            & ( in(X3,X1)
              | in(X3,X0)
              | ~ in(X3,X2) ) )
        | set_union2(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( set_union2(X0,X1) = X2
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ( in(X3,X1)
            | in(X3,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.59SqoYCiQs/Vampire---4.8_25359',d2_xboole_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : SET909+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 17:50:44 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.10/0.31  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.16/0.31  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.59SqoYCiQs/Vampire---4.8_25359
% 0.60/0.78  % (25474)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25470)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25469)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25472)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.78  
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)Memory used [KB]: 1038
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25472)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25475)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.78  
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)Memory used [KB]: 1022
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25475)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25471)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.78  
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)Memory used [KB]: 1040
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25471)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25474)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25468)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.78  
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)Memory used [KB]: 1050
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25468)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25469)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.78  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.78  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.78  
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)Memory used [KB]: 1051
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25473)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.78  % (25466)Success in time 0.463 s
% 0.60/0.78  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------