TSTP Solution File: SET907+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AvtRHaH4PO true

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:16:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 1.28s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 1.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   9 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  13 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  114 (  14   ~;   9   |;   3   &;  84   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   8   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   0   ^;  28   !;   0   ?;  28   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(set_union2_type,type,
    set_union2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
    unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(in_type,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk__2_type,type,
    sk__2: $i ).

thf(subset_type,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk__4_type,type,
    sk__4: $i ).

thf(sk__3_type,type,
    sk__3: $i ).

thf(t38_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
    <=> ( ( in @ A @ C )
        & ( in @ B @ C ) ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl12,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ ( unordered_pair @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( in @ X0 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t38_zfmisc_1]) ).

thf(t12_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ A @ B )
     => ( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
        = B ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( set_union2 @ X1 @ X0 )
        = X0 )
      | ~ ( subset @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t12_xboole_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl90,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
      | ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
      | ( ( set_union2 @ ( unordered_pair @ X2 @ X1 ) @ X0 )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl12,zip_derived_cl9]) ).

thf(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
      = ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2 @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( set_union2 @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl102,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
      | ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
      | ( ( set_union2 @ X0 @ ( unordered_pair @ X2 @ X1 ) )
        = X0 ) ),
    inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl90,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(t48_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ A @ B )
        & ( in @ C @ B ) )
     => ( ( set_union2 @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B )
        = B ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ A @ B )
          & ( in @ C @ B ) )
       => ( ( set_union2 @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B )
          = B ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t48_zfmisc_1]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
    ( ( set_union2 @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__4 ) @ sk__3 )
   != sk__3 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl2_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2 @ X1 @ X0 )
      = ( set_union2 @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl70,plain,
    ( ( set_union2 @ sk__3 @ ( unordered_pair @ sk__2 @ sk__4 ) )
   != sk__3 ),
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl13,zip_derived_cl2]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl113,plain,
    ( ~ ( in @ sk__2 @ sk__3 )
    | ~ ( in @ sk__4 @ sk__3 )
    | ( sk__3 != sk__3 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl102,zip_derived_cl70]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl15,plain,
    in @ sk__2 @ sk__3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
    in @ sk__4 @ sk__3,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl116,plain,
    sk__3 != sk__3,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl113,zip_derived_cl15,zip_derived_cl14]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl117,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl116]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.AvtRHaH4PO true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 09:46:38 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.20/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.06/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.06/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.06/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.28/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.28/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.28/0.75  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.28/0.75  % BCE start: 16
% 1.28/0.75  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.28/0.75  % PE start: 16
% 1.28/0.75  logic: eq
% 1.28/0.75  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.28/0.75  % done 42 iterations in 0.020s
% 1.28/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.28/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/0.75  
% 1.28/0.75  
% 1.28/0.75  % Terminating...
% 1.49/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.49/0.87  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------