TSTP Solution File: SET907+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:21:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 0.65s
% Output : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 21:12:02 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.37 Sat Jul 9 21:12:02 2022
% 0.21/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28365.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.37 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.21/0.37 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [copy,10,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.21/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.21/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 9
% 0.21/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 18
% 0.21/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.21/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.21/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.21/0.40 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.21/0.40 distinct function count: 2
% 0.21/0.40 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 2 [ 1 0 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 13535 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 3 [ 1 0 191 ] (0.00 seconds, 9418 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 4 [ 2 1 270 ] (0.00 seconds, 159829 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 5 [ 2 1 190 ] (0.00 seconds, 196659 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 6 [ 2 0 195 ] (0.00 seconds, 82921 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 7 [ 12 0 234 ] (0.00 seconds, 15599 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 8 [ 13 0 305 ] (0.00 seconds, 81846 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.25 sec ----> 39 [binary,37.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 5 [] {+} -subset(A,B)|set_union2(A,B)=B.
% 0.46/0.65 8 [] {+} subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C)| -in(A,C)| -in(B,C).
% 0.46/0.65 9 [] {+} set_union2(unordered_pair($c5,$c3),$c4)!=$c4.
% 0.46/0.65 16 [] {+} in($c5,$c4).
% 0.46/0.65 17 [] {+} in($c3,$c4).
% 0.46/0.65 24 [hyper,17,8,16] {-} subset(unordered_pair($c5,$c3),$c4).
% 0.46/0.65 37 [hyper,24,5] {-} set_union2(unordered_pair($c5,$c3),$c4)=$c4.
% 0.46/0.65 39 [binary,37.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.46/0.65 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 ============ end of search ============
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 true clauses given 3 (21.4%)
% 0.46/0.65 false clauses given 11
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 FALSE TRUE
% 0.46/0.65 5 1 0
% 0.46/0.65 7 4 3
% 0.46/0.65 8 0 2
% 0.46/0.65 tot: 5 5 (50.0% true)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 8 [ 13 0 305 ] (0.00 seconds, 81846 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Process 28365 finished Sat Jul 9 21:12:02 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------