TSTP Solution File: SET907+1 by SInE---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 03:46:04 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   66 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  22   ~;  16   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  32   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/tmp/tmpDyUzIZ/sel_SET907+1.p_1',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( in(X1,X2)
        & in(X3,X2) )
     => set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = X2 ),
    file('/tmp/tmpDyUzIZ/sel_SET907+1.p_1',t48_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(5,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/tmp/tmpDyUzIZ/sel_SET907+1.p_1',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(7,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/tmp/tmpDyUzIZ/sel_SET907+1.p_1',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(8,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/tmp/tmpDyUzIZ/sel_SET907+1.p_1',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X3,X2) )
       => set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[2]) ).

fof(18,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
        | ( in(X1,X3)
          & in(X2,X3) ) )
      & ( ~ in(X1,X3)
        | ~ in(X2,X3)
        | subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

fof(19,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ( in(X4,X6)
          & in(X5,X6) ) )
      & ( ~ in(X4,X6)
        | ~ in(X5,X6)
        | subset(unordered_pair(X4,X5),X6) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

fof(20,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( in(X4,X6)
        | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X4,X5),X6) )
      & ( in(X5,X6)
        | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X4,X5),X6) )
      & ( ~ in(X4,X6)
        | ~ in(X5,X6)
        | subset(unordered_pair(X4,X5),X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

fof(24,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( in(X1,X2)
      & in(X3,X2)
      & set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) != X2 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

fof(25,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( in(X4,X5)
      & in(X6,X5)
      & set_union2(unordered_pair(X4,X6),X5) != X5 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

fof(26,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & in(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & set_union2(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) != esk2_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[25]) ).

cnf(27,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) != esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

cnf(28,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

cnf(29,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

fof(36,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : set_union2(X3,X4) = set_union2(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36]) ).

fof(41,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : unordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

fof(43,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
      | set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

fof(44,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
      | set_union2(X3,X4) = X4 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[43]) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

cnf(64,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk2_0,unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0)) != esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[27,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(77,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),esk2_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,29,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(96,negated_conjecture,
    subset(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk1_0),esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[77,28,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(97,negated_conjecture,
    subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0),esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[96,42,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(114,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) = esk2_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[45,97,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(117,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk2_0,unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0)) = esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[114,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(118,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[117,64,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(119,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    118,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET907+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpDyUzIZ/sel_SET907+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SET907+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET907+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SET/SET907+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------