TSTP Solution File: SET907+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:33:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 26.04s 26.36s
% Output   : Refutation 26.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 21:59:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/1.02  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/1.02  Process 31205 was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/1.02  Sat Jul  9 21:59:08 2022
% 0.44/1.02  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_30835_n015.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_30835_n015.cluster.edu
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/1.02  set(auto2).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/1.02      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/1.02      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/1.02      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.02  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/1.02  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/1.02  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/1.02  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/1.02  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (12 formulas)
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/1.02  1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  3 (all A all B set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  4 (all A all B (-empty(A) -> -empty(set_union2(A,B)))) # label(fc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  5 (all A all B (-empty(A) -> -empty(set_union2(B,A)))) # label(fc3_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  6 (all A all B set_union2(A,A) = A) # label(idempotence_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  7 (exists A empty(A)) # label(rc1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  8 (exists A -empty(A)) # label(rc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  9 (all A all B subset(A,A)) # label(reflexivity_r1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  10 (all A all B (subset(A,B) -> set_union2(A,B) = B)) # label(t12_xboole_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  11 (all A all B all C (subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) <-> in(A,C) & in(B,C))) # label(t38_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  12 -(all A all B all C (in(A,B) & in(C,B) -> set_union2(unordered_pair(A,C),B) = B)) # label(t48_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/1.02  
% 0.44/1.02  Auto_denials:
% 0.44/1.02    % copying label rc2_xboole_0 to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/1.02    % copying label antisymmetry_r2_hidden to answer in negative clause
% 0.44/1.02    % copying label t48_zfmisc_1 to answer in negative clause
% 26.04/26.36    % assign(max_proofs, 3).  % (Horn set with more than one neg. clause)
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  Term ordering decisions:
% 26.04/26.36  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1. set_union2=1. unordered_pair=1.
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 26.04/26.36  % SZS status Theorem
% 26.04/26.36  % SZS output start Refutation
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds: t48_zfmisc_1.
% 26.04/26.36  % Length of proof is 15.
% 26.04/26.36  % Level of proof is 3.
% 26.04/26.36  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 26.04/26.36  % Given clauses 23.
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  2 (all A all B unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 26.04/26.36  3 (all A all B set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A)) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 26.04/26.36  10 (all A all B (subset(A,B) -> set_union2(A,B) = B)) # label(t12_xboole_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 26.04/26.36  11 (all A all B all C (subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) <-> in(A,C) & in(B,C))) # label(t38_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 26.04/26.36  12 -(all A all B all C (in(A,B) & in(C,B) -> set_union2(unordered_pair(A,C),B) = B)) # label(t48_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 26.04/26.36  15 in(c3,c4) # label(t48_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(12)].
% 26.04/26.36  16 in(c5,c4) # label(t48_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(12)].
% 26.04/26.36  18 unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A) # label(commutativity_k2_tarski) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 26.04/26.36  19 set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) # label(commutativity_k2_xboole_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 26.04/26.36  22 set_union2(unordered_pair(c3,c5),c4) != c4 # label(t48_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(t48_zfmisc_1).  [clausify(12)].
% 26.04/26.36  23 set_union2(c4,unordered_pair(c3,c5)) != c4 # answer(t48_zfmisc_1).  [copy(22),rewrite([19(5)])].
% 26.04/26.36  26 -subset(A,B) | set_union2(A,B) = B # label(t12_xboole_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 26.04/26.36  29 subset(unordered_pair(A,B),C) | -in(A,C) | -in(B,C) # label(t38_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 26.04/26.36  35 subset(unordered_pair(c3,c5),c4).  [hyper(29,b,16,a,c,15,a),rewrite([18(3)])].
% 26.04/26.36  43 $F # answer(t48_zfmisc_1).  [hyper(26,a,35,a),rewrite([19(5)]),unit_del(a,23)].
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  % SZS output end Refutation
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  % Disable descendants (x means already disabled):
% 26.04/26.36   22x 23
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  Given=134. Generated=10135. Kept=134. proofs=1.
% 26.04/26.36  Usable=133. Sos=0. Demods=9. Limbo=0, Disabled=17. Hints=0.
% 26.04/26.36  Megabytes=0.66.
% 26.04/26.36  User_CPU=25.34, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=25.
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  ============================== end of search =========================
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  SEARCH FAILED
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 26.04/26.36  
% 26.04/26.36  Process 31205 exit (sos_empty) Sat Jul  9 21:59:33 2022
% 26.04/26.36  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------