TSTP Solution File: SET907+1 by Leo-III---1.7.7

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:54:48 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 2.68s 1.75s
% Output   : Refutation 2.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  13 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  143 (  14   ~;   0   |;   7   &; 108   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0   ^;  45   !;   4   ?;  49   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(in_type,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(set_union2_type,type,
    set_union2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
    unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(empty_type,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(subset_type,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
      = ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
      = ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( in @ A @ B )
        & ( in @ C @ B ) )
     => ( ( set_union2 @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B )
        = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t48_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ A @ B )
          & ( in @ C @ B ) )
       => ( ( set_union2 @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B )
          = B ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
        ( ( ( in @ A @ B )
          & ( in @ C @ B ) )
       => ( ( set_union2 @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ C ) @ B )
          = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
    <=> ( ( in @ A @ C )
        & ( in @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( subset @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C )
       => ( ( in @ A @ C )
          & ( in @ B @ C ) ) )
      & ( ( ( in @ A @ C )
          & ( in @ B @ C ) )
       => ( subset @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( subset @ A @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( subset @ A @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( empty @ A )
     => ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( empty @ A )
     => ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ A @ B )
     => ( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
        = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_xboole_1) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( subset @ A @ B )
     => ( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
        = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( empty @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( empty @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
      = ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
      = ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2 @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( set_union2 @ A @ A )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( empty @ A )
     => ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc3_xboole_0) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( empty @ A )
     => ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( in @ A @ B )
     => ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( in @ A @ B )
     => ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(54,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,14,46,41,27,43,38,21,33,36,30,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.16  % Command  : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.16/0.38  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.38  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.38  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.38  % DateTime : Thu May 18 18:46:55 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.92/0.86  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.08/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (123ms). 
% 1.08/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.57/1.22  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.57/1.22  % [INFO] 	 cvc4 registered as external prover. 
% 1.57/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.66/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture and 11 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.66/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 11 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.66/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 1.66/1.33  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.66/1.33  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.68/1.75  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.68/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.68/1.75  % Time passed: 1219ms (effective reasoning time: 750ms)
% 2.68/1.75  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 2.68/1.75  % Axioms used in derivation (11): fc2_xboole_0, commutativity_k2_xboole_0, fc3_xboole_0, commutativity_k2_tarski, t38_zfmisc_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski, rc1_xboole_0, t12_xboole_1, idempotence_k2_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 2.68/1.75  % No. of inferences in proof: 26
% 2.68/1.75  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1219 ms resp. 750 ms w/o parsing
% 2.92/1.78  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.92/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------