TSTP Solution File: SET907+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:20 EDT 2023

% Result   : Timeout 0.28s 300.15s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  16   ~;  12   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn;  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t48_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( in(X1,X2)
        & in(X3,X2) )
     => set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GROr5Lj8dS/E---3.1_23632.p',t48_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t12_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GROr5Lj8dS/E---3.1_23632.p',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(t38_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GROr5Lj8dS/E---3.1_23632.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GROr5Lj8dS/E---3.1_23632.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X3,X2) )
       => set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t48_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( ~ subset(X24,X25)
      | set_union2(X24,X25) = X25 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( in(X16,X18)
        | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X16,X17),X18) )
      & ( in(X17,X18)
        | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X16,X17),X18) )
      & ( ~ in(X16,X18)
        | ~ in(X17,X18)
        | subset(unordered_pair(X16,X17),X18) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t38_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & in(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & set_union2(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) != esk2_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X7,X8] : set_union2(X7,X8) = set_union2(X8,X7),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0),esk2_0) != esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X3
    | ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk2_0,unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk3_0)) != esk2_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) = X1
    | ~ in(X3,X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem    : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 16:51:16 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GROr5Lj8dS/E---3.1_23632.p
% 0.28/300.15  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.28/300.15  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/300.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # new_bool_1 with pid 23711 completed with status 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.28/300.15  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/300.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.28/300.15  # Search class: FHHSM-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/300.15  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 23714 completed with status 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.28/300.15  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/300.15  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.28/300.15  # Search class: FHHSM-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/300.15  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.28/300.15  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.28/300.15  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.28/300.15  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.28/300.15  
% 0.28/300.15  # Proof found!
% 0.28/300.15  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.28/300.15  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/300.15  # Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.28/300.15  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.28/300.15  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.28/300.15  # Processed clauses                    : 61
% 0.28/300.15  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.28/300.15  # ...subsumed                          : 14
% 0.28/300.15  # ...remaining for further processing  : 45
% 0.28/300.15  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.28/300.15  # Generated clauses                    : 56
% 0.28/300.15  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 39
% 0.28/300.15  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Paramodulations                      : 56
% 0.28/300.15  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Total rewrite steps                  : 10
% 0.28/300.15  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.28/300.15  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.28/300.15  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.28/300.15  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.28/300.15  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.28/300.15  # Current number of processed clauses  : 28
% 0.28/300.15  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.28/300.15  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.28/300.15  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.28/300.15  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 13
% 0.28/300.15  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.28/300.15  # ...number of literals in the above   : 30
% 0.28/300.15  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.28/300.15  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 41
% 0.28/300.15  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.28/300.15  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 0.28/300.15  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.28/300.15  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 19
% 0.28/300.15  # BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 0.28/300.15  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.28/300.15  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1153
% 0.28/300.15  
% 0.28/300.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/300.15  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.28/300.15  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.28/300.15  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.28/300.15  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.28/300.15  
% 0.28/300.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/300.15  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.28/300.15  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.28/300.15  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.28/300.15  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.28/300.15  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------