TSTP Solution File: SET907+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:36:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   8 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   39 (  16   ~;  12   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   5   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn;  20   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    set_union2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

fof(t48_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( in(X1,X2)
        & in(X3,X2) )
     => set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t48_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t12_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(t38_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t38_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X3,X2) )
       => set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2) = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t48_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] :
      ( ~ subset(X18,X19)
      | set_union2(X18,X19) = X19 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( in(X20,X22)
        | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X20,X21),X22) )
      & ( in(X21,X22)
        | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X20,X21),X22) )
      & ( ~ in(X20,X22)
        | ~ in(X21,X22)
        | subset(unordered_pair(X20,X21),X22) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t38_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & in(esk5_0,esk4_0)
    & set_union2(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk5_0),esk4_0) != esk4_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] : set_union2(X8,X9) = set_union2(X9,X8),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,X2) = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X3),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk5_0),esk4_0) != esk4_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( set_union2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X3
    | ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk4_0,unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk5_0)) != esk4_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( set_union2(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) = X1
    | ~ in(X3,X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk5_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET907+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 09:55:00 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.58  % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.20/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.58  % Total time : 0.011000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------