TSTP Solution File: SET904+1 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.12
% Problem : SET904+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:07:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 4.74s 2.55s
% Output : Refutation 4.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 1 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 75 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 0 &; 63 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 7 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 7 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 ^ 14 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(subset_type,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(set_union2_type,type,
set_union2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_type,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk1_type,type,
sk1: $i ).
thf(sk2_type,type,
sk2: $i ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) @ B )
=> ( in @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t45_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) @ B )
=> ( in @ A @ B ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(12,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) @ B )
=> ( in @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(14,plain,
subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ sk1 ) @ sk2 ) @ sk2,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[12]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) @ B )
=> ( in @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l21_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(36,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) @ B )
=> ( in @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) @ B )
| ( in @ A @ B ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[36]) ).
thf(97,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
| ( ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ sk1 ) @ sk2 ) @ sk2 )
!= ( subset @ ( set_union2 @ ( singleton @ A ) @ B ) @ B ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[14,37]) ).
thf(98,plain,
in @ sk1 @ sk2,
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[97:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).
thf(13,plain,
~ ( in @ sk1 @ sk2 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[12]) ).
thf(126,plain,
$false,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[98,13]) ).
thf(127,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[126]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SET904+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Mon May 20 12:00:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.99/0.95 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.26/1.12 % [INFO] Parsing done (169ms).
% 1.26/1.14 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.86/1.50 % [INFO] nitpick registered as external prover.
% 1.86/1.51 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.98/1.60 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 9 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.11/1.64 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 9 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.11/1.65 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.11/1.66 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.11/1.66 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.74/2.54 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.74/2.55 % Time passed: 2067ms (effective reasoning time: 1400ms)
% 4.74/2.55 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.74/2.55 % Axioms used in derivation (1): l21_zfmisc_1
% 4.74/2.55 % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 4.74/2.55 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2067 ms resp. 1400 ms w/o parsing
% 4.74/2.58 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.74/2.58 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------