TSTP Solution File: SET903+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SET903+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:26:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (  84 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  102 (  46   ~;  19   |;  36   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (  35   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f116,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f115,f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( set_union2(sK2,sK1) = singleton(sK0)
    & empty_set != sK1
    & empty_set != sK2
    & sK1 != sK2 ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f18,f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( singleton(X0) = set_union2(X2,X1)
        & empty_set != X1
        & empty_set != X2
        & X1 != X2 )
   => ( set_union2(sK2,sK1) = singleton(sK0)
      & empty_set != sK1
      & empty_set != sK2
      & sK1 != sK2 ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( singleton(X0) = set_union2(X2,X1)
      & empty_set != X1
      & empty_set != X2
      & X1 != X2 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ? [X2,X1,X0] :
      ( set_union2(X0,X1) = singleton(X2)
      & empty_set != X1
      & empty_set != X0
      & X0 != X1 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X0] :
        ~ ( set_union2(X0,X1) = singleton(X2)
          & empty_set != X1
          & empty_set != X0
          & X0 != X1 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X0] :
        ~ ( singleton(X0) = set_union2(X1,X2)
          & X1 != X2
          & empty_set != X1
          & empty_set != X2 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X0] :
      ~ ( singleton(X0) = set_union2(X1,X2)
        & X1 != X2
        & empty_set != X1
        & empty_set != X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t44_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    sK1 = sK2,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f114]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ( sK1 = sK2
    | sK2 != sK2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f82,f80]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    singleton(sK0) = sK2,
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ! [X8] :
      ( singleton(X8) != singleton(sK0)
      | singleton(X8) = sK2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f76,f29]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    empty_set != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X8] :
      ( singleton(X8) != singleton(sK0)
      | empty_set = sK2
      | singleton(X8) = sK2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f46,f31]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    set_union2(sK2,sK1) = singleton(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( singleton(X0) != set_union2(X2,X1)
      | singleton(X0) = X2
      | empty_set = X2 ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set = X2
      | singleton(X0) != set_union2(X2,X1)
      | singleton(X0) = X2
      | singleton(X0) = X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( singleton(X0) = X1
        & empty_set = X2 )
      | ( singleton(X0) = X1
        & singleton(X0) = X2 )
      | singleton(X0) != set_union2(X2,X1)
      | ( empty_set = X1
        & singleton(X0) = X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X2,X1] :
      ( ( singleton(X0) = X2
        & empty_set = X1 )
      | ( singleton(X0) = X2
        & singleton(X0) = X1 )
      | singleton(X0) != set_union2(X1,X2)
      | ( empty_set = X2
        & singleton(X0) = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X1,X0] :
      ~ ( ~ ( empty_set = X2
            & singleton(X0) = X1 )
        & ~ ( singleton(X0) = X2
            & empty_set = X1 )
        & singleton(X0) = set_union2(X1,X2)
        & ~ ( singleton(X0) = X2
            & singleton(X0) = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t43_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X9] :
      ( singleton(X9) != sK2
      | sK1 = singleton(X9) ),
    inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f78,f80]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X9] :
      ( singleton(X9) != singleton(sK0)
      | sK1 = singleton(X9) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f77,f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    empty_set != sK1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X9] :
      ( sK1 = singleton(X9)
      | empty_set = sK1
      | singleton(X9) != singleton(sK0) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f46,f63]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    set_union2(sK1,sK2) = singleton(sK0),
    inference(superposition,[],[f43,f31]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X1,X0),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] : set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SET903+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 14:38:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (19046)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (19046)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.50  % (19054)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (19027)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)Time elapsed: 0.085 s
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (19046)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (19024)Success in time 0.159 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------