TSTP Solution File: SET902+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SET902+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:36:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  18 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (  58 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  32   ~;  19   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   4   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   4 sgn;  23   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    set_union2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t43_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( singleton(X1) = set_union2(X2,X3)
        & ~ ( X2 = singleton(X1)
            & X3 = singleton(X1) )
        & ~ ( X2 = empty_set
            & X3 = singleton(X1) )
        & ~ ( X2 = singleton(X1)
            & X3 = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t43_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l4_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,singleton(X2))
    <=> ( X1 = empty_set
        | X1 = singleton(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l4_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(idempotence_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(l1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : singleton(X1) != empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X20,X21] : subset(X20,set_union2(X20,X21)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5] : set_union2(X4,X5) = set_union2(X5,X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ~ ( singleton(X1) = set_union2(X2,X3)
          & ~ ( X2 = singleton(X1)
              & X3 = singleton(X1) )
          & ~ ( X2 = empty_set
              & X3 = singleton(X1) )
          & ~ ( X2 = singleton(X1)
              & X3 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t43_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk3_0) = set_union2(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & ( esk4_0 != singleton(esk3_0)
      | esk5_0 != singleton(esk3_0) )
    & ( esk4_0 != empty_set
      | esk5_0 != singleton(esk3_0) )
    & ( esk4_0 != singleton(esk3_0)
      | esk5_0 != empty_set ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X12,singleton(X13))
        | X12 = empty_set
        | X12 = singleton(X13) )
      & ( X12 != empty_set
        | subset(X12,singleton(X13)) )
      & ( X12 != singleton(X13)
        | subset(X12,singleton(X13)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l4_zfmisc_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk3_0) = set_union2(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | X1 = singleton(X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk5_0,singleton(esk3_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk4_0,singleton(esk3_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_0 != empty_set
    | esk5_0 != singleton(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk3_0) = esk5_0
    | esk5_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_0 != singleton(esk3_0)
    | esk5_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk3_0) = esk4_0
    | esk4_0 = empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_0 != singleton(esk3_0)
    | esk5_0 != singleton(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk5_0 = empty_set
    | esk4_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_0 = empty_set
    | esk5_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk4_0 = empty_set
    | esk5_0 != esk4_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X10] : set_union2(X10,X10) = X10,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[idempotence_k2_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X11] : singleton(X11) != empty_set,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[l1_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_union2(empty_set,esk4_0) = singleton(esk3_0)
    | esk4_0 != empty_set ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_23]),c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = empty_set,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    set_union2(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    singleton(X1) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_29])]),c_0_31]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET902+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 10:30:07 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59  % Total time : 0.006000 s
% 0.19/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59  % Total time : 0.009000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------