TSTP Solution File: SET899+1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : SET899+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 03:38:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 2 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 7 ~; 6 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 sgn 18 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t40_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [A,B,C] :
( subset(A,B)
=> ( in(C,A)
| subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ) ) ).
fof(l3_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [A,B,C] :
( subset(A,B)
=> ( in(C,A)
| subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ) ) ).
fof(subgoal_0,plain,
! [A,B,C] :
( ( subset(A,B)
& ~ in(C,A) )
=> subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ),
inference(strip,[],[t40_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(negate_0_0,plain,
~ ! [A,B,C] :
( ( subset(A,B)
& ~ in(C,A) )
=> subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ),
inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
? [A,B,C] :
( ~ in(C,A)
& ~ subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C)))
& subset(A,B) ),
inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).
fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
! [A,B,C] :
( ~ subset(A,B)
| in(C,A)
| subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ),
inference(canonicalize,[],[l3_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
! [A,B,C] :
( ~ subset(A,B)
| in(C,A)
| subset(A,set_difference(B,singleton(C))) ),
inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).
fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[],[normalize_0_0,normalize_0_2]) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
$false,
inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SET899+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 23:51:46 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.34
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------