TSTP Solution File: SET890+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:01:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 3.58s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( singleton(X0) = X1
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
        <=> X0 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( union(X0) = X1
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
        <=> ? [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X0)
              & in(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
     => subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l50_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f10,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t31_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) = X0,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,union(X1))
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ? [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) != X0,
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 = X1
        | ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
        | X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 = X1
        | ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
        | X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( singleton(X0) = X1
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( X0 != X2
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( X0 = X2
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( ( in(X2,X1)
              | X0 != X2 )
            & ( X0 = X2
              | ~ in(X2,X1) ) )
        | singleton(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( singleton(X0) = X1
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( X0 != X2
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( X0 = X2
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | X0 != X3 )
            & ( X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | singleton(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ( X0 != X2
            | ~ in(X2,X1) )
          & ( X0 = X2
            | in(X2,X1) ) )
     => ( ( sK0(X0,X1) != X0
          | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
        & ( sK0(X0,X1) = X0
          | in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( singleton(X0) = X1
        | ( ( sK0(X0,X1) != X0
            | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
          & ( sK0(X0,X1) = X0
            | in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | X0 != X3 )
            & ( X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | singleton(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f20,f21]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
            | ~ in(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X1)
          & in(X2,X0) )
     => ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
        & in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
          & in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f24,f25]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( union(X0) = X1
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,X0)
                  | ~ in(X2,X3) )
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,X0)
                  & in(X2,X3) )
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( ( in(X2,X1)
              | ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,X0)
                  | ~ in(X2,X3) ) )
            & ( ? [X3] :
                  ( in(X3,X0)
                  & in(X2,X3) )
              | ~ in(X2,X1) ) )
        | union(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( union(X0) = X1
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( ! [X3] :
                  ( ~ in(X3,X0)
                  | ~ in(X2,X3) )
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( ? [X4] :
                  ( in(X4,X0)
                  & in(X2,X4) )
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X5] :
            ( ( in(X5,X1)
              | ! [X6] :
                  ( ~ in(X6,X0)
                  | ~ in(X5,X6) ) )
            & ( ? [X7] :
                  ( in(X7,X0)
                  & in(X5,X7) )
              | ~ in(X5,X1) ) )
        | union(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ( ! [X3] :
                ( ~ in(X3,X0)
                | ~ in(X2,X3) )
            | ~ in(X2,X1) )
          & ( ? [X4] :
                ( in(X4,X0)
                & in(X2,X4) )
            | in(X2,X1) ) )
     => ( ( ! [X3] :
              ( ~ in(X3,X0)
              | ~ in(sK2(X0,X1),X3) )
          | ~ in(sK2(X0,X1),X1) )
        & ( ? [X4] :
              ( in(X4,X0)
              & in(sK2(X0,X1),X4) )
          | in(sK2(X0,X1),X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X0)
          & in(sK2(X0,X1),X4) )
     => ( in(sK3(X0,X1),X0)
        & in(sK2(X0,X1),sK3(X0,X1)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X5] :
      ( ? [X7] :
          ( in(X7,X0)
          & in(X5,X7) )
     => ( in(sK4(X0,X5),X0)
        & in(X5,sK4(X0,X5)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( union(X0) = X1
        | ( ( ! [X3] :
                ( ~ in(X3,X0)
                | ~ in(sK2(X0,X1),X3) )
            | ~ in(sK2(X0,X1),X1) )
          & ( ( in(sK3(X0,X1),X0)
              & in(sK2(X0,X1),sK3(X0,X1)) )
            | in(sK2(X0,X1),X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X5] :
            ( ( in(X5,X1)
              | ! [X6] :
                  ( ~ in(X6,X0)
                  | ~ in(X5,X6) ) )
            & ( ( in(sK4(X0,X5),X0)
                & in(X5,sK4(X0,X5)) )
              | ~ in(X5,X1) ) )
        | union(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f28,f31,f30,f29]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( ? [X0] : union(singleton(X0)) != X0
   => sK7 != union(singleton(sK7)) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    sK7 != union(singleton(sK7)),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7])],[f16,f37]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X3
      | ~ in(X3,X1)
      | singleton(X0) != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( in(X3,X1)
      | X0 != X3
      | singleton(X0) != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X5] :
      ( in(X5,sK4(X0,X5))
      | ~ in(X5,X1)
      | union(X0) != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X5] :
      ( in(sK4(X0,X5),X0)
      | ~ in(X5,X1)
      | union(X0) != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,union(X1))
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    sK7 != union(singleton(sK7)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X3,X1] :
      ( in(X3,X1)
      | singleton(X3) != X1 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ! [X3] : in(X3,singleton(X3)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ! [X3,X0] :
      ( X0 = X3
      | ~ in(X3,singleton(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ! [X0,X5] :
      ( in(sK4(X0,X5),X0)
      | ~ in(X5,union(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0,X5] :
      ( in(X5,sK4(X0,X5))
      | ~ in(X5,union(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f50]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X0)
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    in(X0,singleton(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,singleton(X1))
    | X0 = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
    | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( in(sK1(X0,X1),X0)
    | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,union(X1))
    | in(sK4(X1,X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

cnf(c_65,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,union(X1))
    | in(X0,sK4(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

cnf(c_66,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,X1)
    | subset(X0,union(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    union(singleton(sK7)) != sK7,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

cnf(c_429,plain,
    singleton(sK7) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_430,plain,
    union(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_431,negated_conjecture,
    sP1_iProver_def != sK7,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_429,c_430]) ).

cnf(c_685,plain,
    in(sK7,sP0_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_429,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_708,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,sP0_iProver_def)
    | subset(X0,sP1_iProver_def) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_430,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_711,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK7,sP0_iProver_def)
    | subset(sK7,sP1_iProver_def) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_708]) ).

cnf(c_718,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,sP0_iProver_def)
    | X0 = sK7 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_429,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_735,plain,
    subset(sK7,sP1_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_685,c_708]) ).

cnf(c_766,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,union(sP0_iProver_def))
    | sK4(sP0_iProver_def,X0) = sK7 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_718]) ).

cnf(c_771,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,sP1_iProver_def)
    | sK4(sP0_iProver_def,X0) = sK7 ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_766,c_430]) ).

cnf(c_798,plain,
    ( sK4(sP0_iProver_def,sK1(sP1_iProver_def,X0)) = sK7
    | subset(sP1_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_771]) ).

cnf(c_879,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sP1_iProver_def,sK7)
    | sK7 = sP1_iProver_def ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_735,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_901,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK7,sP1_iProver_def)
    | ~ subset(sP1_iProver_def,sK7)
    | sP1_iProver_def = sK7 ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

cnf(c_1017,plain,
    ( in(sK1(sP1_iProver_def,sK7),sP1_iProver_def)
    | subset(sP1_iProver_def,sK7) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

cnf(c_1018,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1(sP1_iProver_def,sK7),sK7)
    | subset(sP1_iProver_def,sK7) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

cnf(c_1046,plain,
    ~ subset(sP1_iProver_def,sK7),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_879,c_431,c_685,c_711,c_901]) ).

cnf(c_1846,plain,
    sK4(sP0_iProver_def,sK1(sP1_iProver_def,sK7)) = sK7,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_798,c_1046]) ).

cnf(c_1949,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1(sP1_iProver_def,sK7),union(sP0_iProver_def))
    | in(sK1(sP1_iProver_def,sK7),sK7) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1846,c_65]) ).

cnf(c_1954,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1(sP1_iProver_def,sK7),sP1_iProver_def)
    | in(sK1(sP1_iProver_def,sK7),sK7) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1949,c_430]) ).

cnf(c_1960,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1954,c_1017,c_1018,c_901,c_711,c_685,c_431]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SET890+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu May  2 20:37:46 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.58/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------  iProver source info
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.58/1.18  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.58/1.18  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Parsing...
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  clauses                                 21
% 3.58/1.18  conjectures                             1
% 3.58/1.18  EPR                                     6
% 3.58/1.18  Horn                                    17
% 3.58/1.18  unary                                   6
% 3.58/1.18  binary                                  7
% 3.58/1.18  lits                                    45
% 3.58/1.18  lits eq                                 13
% 3.58/1.18  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.58/1.18  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.58/1.18  fd_cond                                 0
% 3.58/1.18  fd_pseudo_cond                          6
% 3.58/1.18  AC symbols                              0
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ 
% 3.58/1.18  Current options:
% 3.58/1.18  ------ 
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.58/1.18  
% 3.58/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------