TSTP Solution File: SET886+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SET886+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:24:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   9   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   3 sgn;  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t27_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3))
     => unordered_pair(X1,X2) = singleton(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Kv2IQ5d3UC/E---3.1_2562.p',t27_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t26_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3))
     => X1 = X3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Kv2IQ5d3UC/E---3.1_2562.p',t26_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Kv2IQ5d3UC/E---3.1_2562.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Kv2IQ5d3UC/E---3.1_2562.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3))
       => unordered_pair(X1,X2) = singleton(X3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t27_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ~ subset(unordered_pair(X7,X8),singleton(X9))
      | X7 = X9 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t26_zfmisc_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X10] : unordered_pair(X10,X10) = singleton(X10),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),singleton(esk3_0))
    & unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0) != singleton(esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),singleton(esk3_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] : unordered_pair(X11,X12) = unordered_pair(X12,X11),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0) != singleton(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X1,X3),unordered_pair(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    subset(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk3_0) != unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(unordered_pair(X3,X1),unordered_pair(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0) != unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SET886+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:09:37 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Kv2IQ5d3UC/E---3.1_2562.p
% 0.15/0.42  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # new_bool_1 with pid 2641 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with pid 2643 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FHUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_107_B00_00_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S071I with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.15/0.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.15/0.42  # Processed clauses                    : 20
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.15/0.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 18
% 0.15/0.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.15/0.42  # Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.15/0.42  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16
% 0.15/0.42  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Paramodulations                      : 20
% 0.15/0.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Total rewrite steps                  : 11
% 0.15/0.42  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.15/0.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.15/0.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 11
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.15/0.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.15/0.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.15/0.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 15
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 393
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1748 pages
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.15/0.42  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------