TSTP Solution File: SET884+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SET884+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:14:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.00s 2.20s
% Output   : Refutation 2.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   8 unt;   1 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   9 equ;   8 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( A != singleton(B)
    | in(C,A)
    | C != B ),
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( A != unordered_pair(B,C)
    | ~ in(D,A)
    | D = B
    | D = C ),
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | ~ in(C,A)
    | in(C,B) ),
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    dollar_c5 != dollar_c4,
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    dollar_c5 != dollar_c3,
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(17,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    subset(singleton(dollar_c5),unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c3)),
    file('SET884+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(28,plain,
    in(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[17,3,17]),
    [iquote('hyper,17,3,17')] ).

cnf(67,plain,
    in(dollar_c5,unordered_pair(dollar_c4,dollar_c3)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[24,10,28]),
    [iquote('hyper,24,10,28')] ).

cnf(104,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[67,5,18]),14,13]),
    [iquote('hyper,67,5,18,unit_del,14,13')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SET884+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 10:52:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.00/2.19  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.00/2.19  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 2.00/2.19  Wed Jul 27 10:52:02 2022
% 2.00/2.19  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 13293.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.00/2.19  set(auto).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.00/2.19  clear(print_given).
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  formula_list(usable).
% 2.00/2.19  all A (A=A).
% 2.00/2.19  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 2.00/2.19  all A B (unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 2.00/2.19  all A B (B=singleton(A)<-> (all C (in(C,B)<->C=A))).
% 2.00/2.19  all A B C (C=unordered_pair(A,B)<-> (all D (in(D,C)<->D=A|D=B))).
% 2.00/2.19  all A B (subset(A,B)<-> (all C (in(C,A)->in(C,B)))).
% 2.00/2.19  exists A empty(A).
% 2.00/2.19  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 2.00/2.19  all A B subset(A,A).
% 2.00/2.19  -(all A B C (-(subset(singleton(A),unordered_pair(B,C))&A!=B&A!=C))).
% 2.00/2.19  end_of_list.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  list(usable).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] A=A.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] B!=singleton(A)| -in(C,B)|C=A.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] B!=singleton(A)|in(C,B)|C!=A.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] B=singleton(A)|in($f1(A,B),B)|$f1(A,B)=A.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] B=singleton(A)| -in($f1(A,B),B)|$f1(A,B)!=A.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] C!=unordered_pair(A,B)| -in(D,C)|D=A|D=B.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] C!=unordered_pair(A,B)|in(D,C)|D!=A.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] C!=unordered_pair(A,B)|in(D,C)|D!=B.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] C=unordered_pair(A,B)|in($f2(A,B,C),C)|$f2(A,B,C)=A|$f2(A,B,C)=B.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] C=unordered_pair(A,B)| -in($f2(A,B,C),C)|$f2(A,B,C)!=A.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] C=unordered_pair(A,B)| -in($f2(A,B,C),C)|$f2(A,B,C)!=B.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] subset(A,B)|in($f3(A,B),A).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f3(A,B),B).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] empty($c1).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] -empty($c2).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] subset(A,A).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] subset(singleton($c5),unordered_pair($c4,$c3)).
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] $c5!=$c4.
% 2.00/2.19  0 [] $c5!=$c3.
% 2.00/2.19  end_of_list.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 2.00/2.19  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 2.00/2.19  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 2.00/2.19  clauses in usable.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 2.00/2.19     dependent: set(factor).
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ------------> process usable:
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 2 [] A!=singleton(B)| -in(C,A)|C=B.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 3 [] A!=singleton(B)|in(C,A)|C!=B.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 4 [] A=singleton(B)| -in($f1(B,A),A)|$f1(B,A)!=B.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 5 [] A!=unordered_pair(B,C)| -in(D,A)|D=B|D=C.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 6 [] A!=unordered_pair(B,C)|in(D,A)|D!=B.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 7 [] A!=unordered_pair(B,C)|in(D,A)|D!=C.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 8 [] A=unordered_pair(B,C)| -in($f2(B,C,A),A)|$f2(B,C,A)!=B.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 9 [] A=unordered_pair(B,C)| -in($f2(B,C,A),A)|$f2(B,C,A)!=C.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 10 [] -subset(A,B)| -in(C,A)|in(C,B).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 11 [] subset(A,B)| -in($f3(A,B),B).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 12 [] -empty($c2).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 13 [] $c5!=$c4.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 14 [] $c5!=$c3.
% 2.00/2.19  
% 2.00/2.19  ------------> process sos:
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 17 [] A=A.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 18 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 19 [] A=singleton(B)|in($f1(B,A),A)|$f1(B,A)=B.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=23): 20 [] A=unordered_pair(B,C)|in($f2(B,C,A),A)|$f2(B,C,A)=B|$f2(B,C,A)=C.
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 21 [] subset(A,B)|in($f3(A,B),A).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 22 [] empty($c1).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 23 [] subset(A,A).
% 2.00/2.19  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 24 [] subset(singleton($c5),unordered_pair($c4,$c3)).
% 2.00/2.19    Following clause subsumed by 17 during input processing: 0 [copy,17,flip.1] A=A.
% 2.00/2.20    Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,18,flip.1] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.01 sec ----> 104 [hyper,67,5,18,unit_del,14,13] $F.
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.00/2.20  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.00/2.20  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.00/2.20  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  ============ end of search ============
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.00/2.20  clauses given                  9
% 2.00/2.20  clauses generated            110
% 2.00/2.20  clauses kept                 103
% 2.00/2.20  clauses forward subsumed      30
% 2.00/2.20  clauses back subsumed          0
% 2.00/2.20  Kbytes malloced              976
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.00/2.20  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.20  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.00/2.20  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.00/2.20  
% 2.00/2.20  Process 13293 finished Wed Jul 27 10:52:03 2022
% 2.00/2.20  Otter interrupted
% 2.00/2.20  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------