TSTP Solution File: SET879+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET879+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:13:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   4 unt;   2 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  14 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( X != singleton(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,X)
    | Z = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( X != singleton(Y)
    | in(Z,X)
    | Z != Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( set_difference(singleton(X),Y) != singleton(X)
    | ~ in(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l34_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( set_difference(singleton(X),Y) = singleton(X)
    | in(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l34_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(10,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4'),singleton('SKOLEMAAAV5')) != singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV4' = 'SKOLEMAAAV5' ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(11,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4'),singleton('SKOLEMAAAV5')) = singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV4' != 'SKOLEMAAAV5' ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    in(X,singleton(X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,theory(equality),theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ( set_difference(singleton(X),singleton(Y)) = singleton(X)
    | X = Y ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    set_difference(singleton(X),singleton(X)) != singleton(X),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,12]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV4' = 'SKOLEMAAAV5',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,13]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[11,18,32,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET879+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 17:48:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T17:48:41
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n016.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T17:48:41
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  #||
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  ||#
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.20/0.52  ;       120 formulas have been input or derived (from 23 formulas).
% 0.20/0.52  ;        33 (28%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.20/0.52  ;            2 ( 6%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.20/0.52  ;           31 (94%) are still being kept.
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.002   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Assert                       (6 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.004  11%   Process new row              (81 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.003   8%   Resolution                   (44 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Paramodulation               (22 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (3 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Condensing                   (15 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (15 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Backward subsumption         (13 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (4 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Forward simplification       (81 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (33 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.001   3%   Ordering                     (112 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.023  62%   Other
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.037        Total
% 0.20/0.52  ;     0.038        Real time
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; Term-hash-array has 55 terms in all.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 11 entries (13 at peak, 13 added, 2 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 49 nodes (75 at peak, 75 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ;  Retrieved 4 possibly forward subsuming rows in 15 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ;  Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 13 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Path-index has 55 entries (59 at peak, 59 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Path-index has 134 nodes (141 at peak, 141 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Trie-index has 55 entries (59 at peak, 59 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Trie-index has 159 nodes (169 at peak, 169 added, 10 deleted).
% 0.20/0.52  ; Retrieved 183 generalization terms in 128 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Retrieved 31 instance terms in 19 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; Retrieved 1,216 unifiable terms in 212 calls.
% 0.20/0.52  ; 
% 0.20/0.52  ; The agenda of rows to process has 28 entries:
% 0.20/0.52  ;     1 with value 6               2 with value 18               1 with value 27
% 0.20/0.52  ;     1 with value 7               3 with value 19               2 with value 28
% 0.20/0.52  ;     2 with value 13              1 with value 21               1 with value 29
% 0.20/0.52  ;     1 with value 14              2 with value 22               3 with value 33
% 0.20/0.52  ;     1 with value 16              1 with value 24               1 with value 43
% 0.20/0.52  ;     3 with value 17              2 with value 25
% 0.20/0.52  ; The agenda of rows to give has 10 entries:
% 0.20/0.52  ;     1 with value (4 6)           1 with value (4 18)           1 with value (4 21)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     1 with value (4 16)          1 with value (4 19)           3 with value (4 26)
% 0.20/0.52  ;     1 with value (4 17)          1 with value (4 20)
% 0.20/0.52  Evaluation took:
% 0.20/0.52    0.038 seconds of real time
% 0.20/0.52    0.032177 seconds of user run time
% 0.20/0.52    0.00577 seconds of system run time
% 0.20/0.52    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.20/0.52    0 page faults and
% 0.20/0.52    2,378,168 bytes consed.
% 0.20/0.52  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.52  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T17:48:41
% 0.20/0.52  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.20/0.52  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------