TSTP Solution File: SET879+1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : SET879+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 04:33:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.42s 0.99s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SET879+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 17:28:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.42/0.99 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.42/0.99 Process 31214 was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.42/0.99 Sun Jul 10 17:28:35 2022
% 0.42/0.99 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_31060_n014.cluster.edu".
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_31060_n014.cluster.edu
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.42/0.99 set(auto2).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.42/0.99 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.42/0.99 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.42/0.99 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.99 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.42/0.99 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.42/0.99 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.42/0.99 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.42/0.99 clear(print_given).
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (6 formulas)
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.42/0.99 1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 2 (all A all B (B = singleton(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> C = A)))) # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 3 (all A all B (set_difference(singleton(A),B) = singleton(A) <-> -in(A,B))) # label(l34_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 4 (exists A empty(A)) # label(rc1_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 5 (exists A -empty(A)) # label(rc2_xboole_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 6 -(all A all B (set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = singleton(A) <-> A != B)) # label(t20_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Auto_denials: (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Assigning unary symbol singleton kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (10).
% 0.42/0.99 Function symbol KB weights: c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. set_difference=1. f1=1. singleton=0.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.42/0.99 % Length of proof is 25.
% 0.42/0.99 % Level of proof is 10.
% 0.42/0.99 % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.42/0.99 % Given clauses 36.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 1 (all A all B (in(A,B) -> -in(B,A))) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 2 (all A all B (B = singleton(A) <-> (all C (in(C,B) <-> C = A)))) # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 3 (all A all B (set_difference(singleton(A),B) = singleton(A) <-> -in(A,B))) # label(l34_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 6 -(all A all B (set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = singleton(A) <-> A != B)) # label(t20_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause). [assumption].
% 0.42/0.99 8 set_difference(singleton(A),B) = singleton(A) | in(A,B) # label(l34_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.42/0.99 11 -in(A,B) | -in(B,A) # label(antisymmetry_r2_hidden) # label(axiom). [clausify(1)].
% 0.42/0.99 12 set_difference(singleton(A),B) != singleton(A) | -in(A,B) # label(l34_zfmisc_1) # label(axiom). [clausify(3)].
% 0.42/0.99 13 singleton(A) != B | -in(C,B) | C = A # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.42/0.99 14 singleton(A) != B | in(C,B) | C != A # label(d1_tarski) # label(axiom). [clausify(2)].
% 0.42/0.99 15 set_difference(singleton(c3),singleton(c4)) = singleton(c3) | c4 != c3 # label(t20_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(6)].
% 0.42/0.99 16 set_difference(singleton(c3),singleton(c4)) != singleton(c3) | c4 = c3 # label(t20_zfmisc_1) # label(negated_conjecture). [clausify(6)].
% 0.42/0.99 18 -in(A,A). [factor(11,a,b)].
% 0.42/0.99 24 singleton(A) != B | C = A | set_difference(singleton(C),B) = singleton(C). [resolve(13,b,8,b)].
% 0.42/0.99 25 in(A,singleton(B)) | A != B. [xx_res(14,a)].
% 0.42/0.99 26 singleton(A) != B | in(A,B). [xx_res(14,c)].
% 0.42/0.99 28 set_difference(singleton(A),A) = singleton(A). [resolve(18,a,8,b)].
% 0.42/0.99 33 in(A,singleton(A)). [xx_res(25,b)].
% 0.42/0.99 35 set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(A)) != singleton(A). [resolve(33,a,12,b)].
% 0.42/0.99 36 -in(singleton(A),A). [resolve(33,a,11,b)].
% 0.42/0.99 39 singleton(singleton(A)) != A. [ur(26,b,36,a)].
% 0.42/0.99 40 -in(A,singleton(singleton(singleton(A)))). [ur(13,a,28,a(flip),c,39,a(flip)),rewrite([28(6)])].
% 0.42/0.99 41 set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(singleton(singleton(A)))) = singleton(A). [resolve(40,a,8,b)].
% 0.42/0.99 52 A = B | set_difference(singleton(A),singleton(B)) = singleton(A). [resolve(24,a,41,a(flip)),rewrite([41(7)])].
% 0.42/0.99 56 c4 = c3. [resolve(52,b,16,a),flip(a),merge(b)].
% 0.42/0.99 63 $F. [back_rewrite(15),rewrite([56(3),56(9)]),xx(b),unit_del(a,35)].
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Given=36. Generated=256. Kept=56. proofs=1.
% 0.42/0.99 Usable=34. Sos=12. Demods=8. Limbo=7, Disabled=14. Hints=0.
% 0.42/0.99 Megabytes=0.08.
% 0.42/0.99 User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.42/0.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.42/0.99
% 0.42/0.99 Process 31214 exit (max_proofs) Sun Jul 10 17:28:35 2022
% 0.42/0.99 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------