TSTP Solution File: SET874+1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : SET874+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:33:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SET874+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 15:48:59 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.40  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.41  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.41  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.21/0.41    fof(d2_tarski, axiom, ![B, C, A2]: (C=unordered_pair(A2, B) <=> ![D]: (in(D, C) <=> (D=A2 | D=B)))).
% 0.21/0.41    fof(l23_zfmisc_1, axiom, ![B2, A2_2]: (in(A2_2, B2) => set_union2(singleton(A2_2), B2)=B2)).
% 0.21/0.41    fof(t14_zfmisc_1, conjecture, ![A, B2]: set_union2(singleton(A), unordered_pair(A, B2))=unordered_pair(A, B2)).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.21/0.41  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.21/0.41  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.21/0.41    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.21/0.41    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.21/0.41  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.21/0.41  variables of u and v.
% 0.21/0.41  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.21/0.41  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  Axiom 1 (d2_tarski_1): equiv(X, Y, X) = true2.
% 0.21/0.41  Axiom 2 (l23_zfmisc_1): fresh(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 0.21/0.41  Axiom 3 (d2_tarski_4): fresh6(X, X, Y, Z) = true2.
% 0.21/0.41  Axiom 4 (l23_zfmisc_1): fresh(in(X, Y), true2, X, Y) = set_union2(singleton(X), Y).
% 0.21/0.41  Axiom 5 (d2_tarski_4): fresh7(X, X, Y, Z, W, V) = in(V, W).
% 0.21/0.41  Axiom 6 (d2_tarski_4): fresh7(equiv(X, Y, Z), true2, X, Y, W, Z) = fresh6(W, unordered_pair(X, Y), W, Z).
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  Goal 1 (t14_zfmisc_1): set_union2(singleton(a), unordered_pair(a, b)) = unordered_pair(a, b).
% 0.21/0.41  Proof:
% 0.21/0.41    set_union2(singleton(a), unordered_pair(a, b))
% 0.21/0.41  = { by axiom 4 (l23_zfmisc_1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41    fresh(in(a, unordered_pair(a, b)), true2, a, unordered_pair(a, b))
% 0.21/0.41  = { by axiom 5 (d2_tarski_4) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41    fresh(fresh7(true2, true2, a, b, unordered_pair(a, b), a), true2, a, unordered_pair(a, b))
% 0.21/0.41  = { by axiom 1 (d2_tarski_1) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41    fresh(fresh7(equiv(a, b, a), true2, a, b, unordered_pair(a, b), a), true2, a, unordered_pair(a, b))
% 0.21/0.41  = { by axiom 6 (d2_tarski_4) }
% 0.21/0.41    fresh(fresh6(unordered_pair(a, b), unordered_pair(a, b), unordered_pair(a, b), a), true2, a, unordered_pair(a, b))
% 0.21/0.41  = { by axiom 3 (d2_tarski_4) }
% 0.21/0.41    fresh(true2, true2, a, unordered_pair(a, b))
% 0.21/0.41  = { by axiom 2 (l23_zfmisc_1) }
% 0.21/0.41    unordered_pair(a, b)
% 0.21/0.41  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.41  
% 0.21/0.41  RESULT: Theorem (the conjecture is true).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------