TSTP Solution File: SET867+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SET867+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:15 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.00s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   6 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   6   ~;   2   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (   8   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (;  10   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > empty > #nlpp > union > empty_set > #skF_1 > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_6 > #skF_5 > #skF_2 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(union,type,
    union: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_55,negated_conjecture,
    union(empty_set) != empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f_37,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( A = empty_set )
    <=> ! [B] : ~ in(B,A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_47,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( B = union(A) )
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,B)
        <=> ? [D] :
              ( in(C,D)
              & in(D,A) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_tarski) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    union(empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_3] :
      ( ( empty_set = A_3 )
      | in('#skF_1'(A_3),A_3) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    ! [A_40,C_41] :
      ( in('#skF_5'(A_40,union(A_40),C_41),A_40)
      | ~ in(C_41,union(A_40)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_47]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [B_6] : ~ in(B_6,empty_set),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_37]) ).

tff(c_85,plain,
    ! [C_42] : ~ in(C_42,union(empty_set)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_4]) ).

tff(c_97,plain,
    union(empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_85]) ).

tff(c_104,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_97]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SET867+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.16/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:09:44 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.00/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.00/1.72  
% 3.00/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.00/1.75  
% 3.00/1.75  Inference rules
% 3.00/1.75  ----------------------
% 3.00/1.75  #Ref     : 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Sup     : 15
% 3.00/1.75  #Fact    : 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Define  : 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Split   : 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Chain   : 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Close   : 0
% 3.00/1.75  
% 3.00/1.75  Ordering : KBO
% 3.00/1.75  
% 3.00/1.75  Simplification rules
% 3.00/1.75  ----------------------
% 3.00/1.75  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Demod        : 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Tautology    : 2
% 3.00/1.75  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.00/1.75  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.00/1.75  
% 3.00/1.75  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.00/1.75  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.00/1.75  
% 3.00/1.75  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.00/1.75  ----------------------
% 3.00/1.75  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 3.00/1.75  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.00/1.75  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.00/1.75  Main loop            : 0.21
% 3.00/1.75  Inferencing          : 0.08
% 3.00/1.75  Reduction            : 0.05
% 3.00/1.75  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 3.00/1.75  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 3.00/1.75  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.00/1.75  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.00/1.75  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.00/1.75  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.00/1.75  Total                : 0.72
% 3.00/1.75  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.00/1.75  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.00/1.75  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.00/1.75  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------