TSTP Solution File: SET865-2 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SET865-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:04:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.34s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| c_lessequals(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_x(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a)),tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a))))
| c_in(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Set_OsubsetD_0)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
c_in(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_OHausdorff_0)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
c_lessequals(c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Ochain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__subset__chain_0)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_x(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a)),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a)))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_x(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a)),tc_set(t_a))
| sPE(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_x(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_x(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a)),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ sPE(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_x(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a)))
| ~ c_in(c_Union(c_Zorn_OHausdorff__1(v_S,t_a),t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET865-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 17:41:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.34 % symbols: 12
% 0.12/0.34 % clauses: 19
% 0.12/0.34 % start clauses: 4
% 0.12/0.34 % iterative deepening steps: 56
% 0.12/0.34 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.12/0.34 % literal attempts: 2749
% 0.12/0.34 % depth failures: 1787
% 0.12/0.34 % regularity failures: 4
% 0.12/0.34 % tautology failures: 126
% 0.12/0.34 % reductions: 16
% 0.12/0.34 % extensions: 2539
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT variables: 985
% 0.12/0.34 % SAT clauses: 1138
% 0.12/0.34 % WalkSAT solutions: 1132
% 0.12/0.34 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.34 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------