TSTP Solution File: SET864-2 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : SET864-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 15:10:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.56s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 7 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ c_in(X0,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(X1,X2),tc_set(tc_set(X2)))
| ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(X0,X2),X3,tc_set(X2))
| ~ c_in(X3,X1,tc_set(X2))
| c_Union(X0,X2) = X3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Zorn_Omaxchain__Zorn_0) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_c,c_Zorn_Omaxchain(v_S,t_a),tc_set(tc_set(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
c_in(c_Union(v_c,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| c_in(v_x(X0),v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_in(X0,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| c_lessequals(X0,v_x(X0),tc_set(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
( v_x(X0) != X0
| ~ c_in(X0,v_S,tc_set(t_a)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_5) ).
cnf(c_301,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(c_Union(v_c,t_a),X0,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(X0,v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| c_Union(v_c,t_a) = X0 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_312,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| ~ c_in(c_Union(v_c,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)) = c_Union(v_c,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_301]) ).
cnf(c_313,plain,
( ~ c_in(v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)) = c_Union(v_c,t_a) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_312,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_320,plain,
( ~ c_in(c_Union(v_c,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a))
| v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)) = c_Union(v_c,t_a) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_313]) ).
cnf(c_321,plain,
v_x(c_Union(v_c,t_a)) = c_Union(v_c,t_a),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_320,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_322,plain,
~ c_in(c_Union(v_c,t_a),v_S,tc_set(t_a)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_54]) ).
cnf(c_325,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_51]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET864-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 15:15:11 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.56/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.56/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 1.56/1.18 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 1.56/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.56/1.18 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 clauses 6
% 1.56/1.18 conjectures 5
% 1.56/1.18 EPR 0
% 1.56/1.18 Horn 6
% 1.56/1.18 unary 2
% 1.56/1.18 binary 3
% 1.56/1.18 lits 12
% 1.56/1.18 lits eq 2
% 1.56/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 1.56/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 1.56/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 1.56/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 1.56/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------
% 1.56/1.18 Current options:
% 1.56/1.18 ------
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.56/1.18
% 1.56/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------